Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23701 - 23710 of 31183 for WA 0852 2611 9277 Anggaran Dana Memasang Ruang Meeting Apartemen Trans Park Juanda Bekasi.
Search results 23701 - 23710 of 31183 for WA 0852 2611 9277 Anggaran Dana Memasang Ruang Meeting Apartemen Trans Park Juanda Bekasi.
COURT OF APPEALS
to the police station to meet with Investigator Theodore Schlitz. Schlitz knew that Kosterman had been advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95725 - 2013-04-23
to the police station to meet with Investigator Theodore Schlitz. Schlitz knew that Kosterman had been advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95725 - 2013-04-23
COURT OF APPEALS
, the trial court requested briefing to be submitted as soon as possible in order to meet the thirty-day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40947 - 2009-09-22
, the trial court requested briefing to be submitted as soon as possible in order to meet the thirty-day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40947 - 2009-09-22
State v. Aristole E. Farmer, Jr.
to meet conventional levels of statistical significance in prediction of recidivism. Farmer claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4834 - 2005-03-31
to meet conventional levels of statistical significance in prediction of recidivism. Farmer claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4834 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
it. Riley also testified and stated that he had no information before meeting with Cole on April 24, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57655 - 2010-12-13
it. Riley also testified and stated that he had no information before meeting with Cole on April 24, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57655 - 2010-12-13
Timothy J. Lipke v. Tri-County Area School Board
. The court rejected Lipke’s argument because Lipke failed to meet his burden to set forth evidentiary proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12594 - 2005-03-31
. The court rejected Lipke’s argument because Lipke failed to meet his burden to set forth evidentiary proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12594 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
meet the minimum requirements. The circuit court stated and considered the primary sentencing factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28683 - 2007-04-16
meet the minimum requirements. The circuit court stated and considered the primary sentencing factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28683 - 2007-04-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
to meet its burden. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d at 274–275, 389 N.W.2d at 26. ¶8 Whether a plea is knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40469 - 2014-09-15
to meet its burden. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d at 274–275, 389 N.W.2d at 26. ¶8 Whether a plea is knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40469 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
been different.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694. If a defendant cannot meet the second prong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73203 - 2011-11-02
been different.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694. If a defendant cannot meet the second prong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73203 - 2011-11-02
State v. Henry J. Brookshire
at 170-171. If the defendant fails to meet this burden, a court properly may deny the motion to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9258 - 2005-03-31
at 170-171. If the defendant fails to meet this burden, a court properly may deny the motion to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9258 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
/appellate counsel concludes that Solis “cannot even arguably meet the prejudice prong of the Strickland
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180205 - 2017-09-21
/appellate counsel concludes that Solis “cannot even arguably meet the prejudice prong of the Strickland
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180205 - 2017-09-21