Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23701 - 23710 of 30246 for de.

COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 707, 718 N.W.2d 260. We review questions of law de novo, but we do not disturb factual findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133135 - 2015-01-20

State v. Michael A. Martin
] The constitutionality of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Borrell, 167 Wis. 2d 749, 762
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7069 - 2005-03-31

State v. John E. Olson
review de novo. See State v. Neumann, 179 Wis.2d 687, 699, 508 N.W.2d 54, 59 (Ct. App. 1993). “[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11160 - 2009-07-15

COURT OF APPEALS
the Fifth Amendment, is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Adams, 221 Wis. 2d 1, 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34789 - 2008-12-08

State v. Shomari L. Robinson
standard of review and then determine as a matter of law under a de novo standard of review whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2552 - 2013-06-19

State v. Reginald Green
requiring this court to construe § 943.28, Stats. Accordingly, our review is de novo. See State v. Sostre
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10482 - 2005-03-31

St. Clare Hospital of Monroe v. City of Monroe
of the term "used as a doctor's office" is a matter of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10533 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to due process is a question of law for de novo review. State v. Coffee, 2020 WI 1, ¶17, 389 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290803 - 2020-09-24

[PDF] WI APP 20
of a statute and of a collective bargaining agreement de novo. State v. Jensen, 2010 WI 38, ¶8, 324 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106754 - 2017-09-21

State v. Nicole A. Fassbender
. 2d 655, 663, 462 N.W.2d 906 (Ct. App. 1990). However, this court decides de novo whether the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26288 - 2006-08-23