Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23721 - 23730 of 29713 for des.
Search results 23721 - 23730 of 29713 for des.
Sallie T. v. Milwaukee County Department of Health and Human Services
. 48, we conduct that part of our review de novo. See McEvoy v. Group Health Coop. of Eau Claire, 213
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17176 - 2005-03-31
. 48, we conduct that part of our review de novo. See McEvoy v. Group Health Coop. of Eau Claire, 213
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17176 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. LaMorris P. Britton
is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion fails to allege sufficient facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11272 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion fails to allege sufficient facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11272 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Barron County v. Kathy S.
due process clause to undisputed facts presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15970 - 2017-09-21
due process clause to undisputed facts presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15970 - 2017-09-21
Howard R. Millen v. James Thomas
judgment is de novo. Kallas, 169 Wis.2d at 417, 485 N.W.2d at 280. Summary judgment is appropriate when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9298 - 2005-03-31
judgment is de novo. Kallas, 169 Wis.2d at 417, 485 N.W.2d at 280. Summary judgment is appropriate when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9298 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI App 183
to our de novo review. State v. Cole, 2000 WI App 52, ¶3, 233 Wis. 2d 577, 608 N.W.2d 432
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43539 - 2009-12-15
to our de novo review. State v. Cole, 2000 WI App 52, ¶3, 233 Wis. 2d 577, 608 N.W.2d 432
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43539 - 2009-12-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo.” State v. Joyner, 2002 WI App 250, ¶16, 258 Wis. 2d 249, 653 N.W.2d 290
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000973 - 2025-08-26
of law that we review de novo.” State v. Joyner, 2002 WI App 250, ¶16, 258 Wis. 2d 249, 653 N.W.2d 290
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000973 - 2025-08-26
COURT OF APPEALS
subject to de novo review. See id., ¶9. “If the motion raises such facts, the [trial] court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108906 - 2014-03-10
subject to de novo review. See id., ¶9. “If the motion raises such facts, the [trial] court must hold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108906 - 2014-03-10
[PDF]
Thomas L. Danielson v. The Larsen Company
. Ziegler, 172 Wis.2d 70, 79, 492 N.W.2d 621, 624 (1992). This court decides questions of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8424 - 2017-09-19
. Ziegler, 172 Wis.2d 70, 79, 492 N.W.2d 621, 624 (1992). This court decides questions of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8424 - 2017-09-19
David Hull v. Medical Associates of Menomonee Falls, Ltd.
. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., 192 Wis.2d 347, 531 N.W.2d 386 (Ct. App. 1995), to argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12418 - 2005-03-31
. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., 192 Wis.2d 347, 531 N.W.2d 386 (Ct. App. 1995), to argue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12418 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Thomas J. Pionke v. Town of Dayton
of Dayton. The Town appeals. On certiorari, we review the board’s action de novo. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13972 - 2014-09-15
of Dayton. The Town appeals. On certiorari, we review the board’s action de novo. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13972 - 2014-09-15