Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23721 - 23730 of 33828 for dismissal.
Search results 23721 - 23730 of 33828 for dismissal.
[PDF]
County of Green v. Geoffrey J. Stout
of controlled substances. We affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of the charges, concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11673 - 2017-09-19
of controlled substances. We affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of the charges, concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11673 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 The plea agreement resulted in the dismissal of another felony offense and civil traffic
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209546 - 2018-03-15
2 The plea agreement resulted in the dismissal of another felony offense and civil traffic
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209546 - 2018-03-15
CA Blank Order
blood, the State agreed to dismiss a second count and propose to the court a joint sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123143 - 2014-10-01
blood, the State agreed to dismiss a second count and propose to the court a joint sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123143 - 2014-10-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In exchange, the State agreed to dismiss the remaining charges as read-in offenses and to make a joint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959095 - 2025-05-20
. In exchange, the State agreed to dismiss the remaining charges as read-in offenses and to make a joint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959095 - 2025-05-20
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Thomas M.
proceeding with his own case in chief, Thomas, who was represented by counsel, did not move to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15066 - 2005-03-31
proceeding with his own case in chief, Thomas, who was represented by counsel, did not move to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15066 - 2005-03-31
Ozaukee County v. Nancy K. Mutsch
. Counsel for Mutsch brought a pretrial “Motion to Dismiss and to Suppress Evidence Based on Lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12012 - 2005-03-31
. Counsel for Mutsch brought a pretrial “Motion to Dismiss and to Suppress Evidence Based on Lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12012 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. As part of the plea negotiations, the State agreed to recommend that remaining charges be dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800322 - 2024-05-14
. As part of the plea negotiations, the State agreed to recommend that remaining charges be dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800322 - 2024-05-14
State v. Robert T. Sankovich
that the ordinance is unconstitutional. Consequently, Sankovich pleaded no contest to OWI and the State dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12866 - 2005-03-31
that the ordinance is unconstitutional. Consequently, Sankovich pleaded no contest to OWI and the State dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12866 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the case should be dismissed because the periods of limitation for the Bruces’ breach-of-contract claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=764282 - 2024-02-21
the case should be dismissed because the periods of limitation for the Bruces’ breach-of-contract claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=764282 - 2024-02-21
[PDF]
State v. James Stankiewicz
. The second charge was dismissed and this appeal follows. “In reviewing an order suppressing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10828 - 2017-09-20
. The second charge was dismissed and this appeal follows. “In reviewing an order suppressing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10828 - 2017-09-20