Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23721 - 23730 of 59033 for do.
Search results 23721 - 23730 of 59033 for do.
[PDF]
Joseph N. Francis v. Maureen M. Francis
to modify maintenance retroactively. Joseph objected, and the court declined. ¶12 We do not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16109 - 2017-09-21
to modify maintenance retroactively. Joseph objected, and the court declined. ¶12 We do not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16109 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no trouble at all, none whatsoever.” The circuit court then asked, “For any other type of reason, do
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248473 - 2019-10-07
no trouble at all, none whatsoever.” The circuit court then asked, “For any other type of reason, do
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248473 - 2019-10-07
[PDF]
State v. Tonda K. McQuinn
to do this, she may decide to submit to the breath test. … [When she returned], I asked McQuinn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2719 - 2017-09-19
to do this, she may decide to submit to the breath test. … [When she returned], I asked McQuinn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2719 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
behavior and serious physical harm, which is shown by a recent overt act, attempt or threat to do serious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72857 - 2014-09-15
behavior and serious physical harm, which is shown by a recent overt act, attempt or threat to do serious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72857 - 2014-09-15
State v. Domingo S. Hernandez
found that counsel's performance was not deficient and that there was no prejudice. We do not decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9367 - 2005-03-31
found that counsel's performance was not deficient and that there was no prejudice. We do not decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9367 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brett A. Brobeck
. And, therefore, they’re asking that I enhance that penalty up to three years. Do you understand that? Brobeck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13980 - 2005-03-31
. And, therefore, they’re asking that I enhance that penalty up to three years. Do you understand that? Brobeck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13980 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assume, as do the parties, that Funches properly raised his claims in the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98457 - 2014-09-15
assume, as do the parties, that Funches properly raised his claims in the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98457 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Bobbie M.
termination of Bobbie M.’s parental rights. Ordinarily, we do not consider arguments raised for the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4931 - 2017-09-19
termination of Bobbie M.’s parental rights. Ordinarily, we do not consider arguments raised for the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4931 - 2017-09-19
State v. Terry Patterson
as follows: (1) Whoever knowingly resists or obstructs an officer while such officer is doing any act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14701 - 2005-03-31
as follows: (1) Whoever knowingly resists or obstructs an officer while such officer is doing any act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14701 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gary E. Andrashko
do the same thing here. No. 95-0293 -4- issues he now seeks to raise, we know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8579 - 2017-09-19
do the same thing here. No. 95-0293 -4- issues he now seeks to raise, we know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8579 - 2017-09-19