Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23731 - 23740 of 86257 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu 2 Baja Ringan Berampu Dairi.
Search results 23731 - 23740 of 86257 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu 2 Baja Ringan Berampu Dairi.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
KASHYAP, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2023AP1108 2 ¶1 DONALD, P.J.1 The State appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800910 - 2024-05-14
KASHYAP, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2023AP1108 2 ¶1 DONALD, P.J.1 The State appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800910 - 2024-05-14
[PDF]
State v. Rodney Calhoun
)(a), STATS.2 Calhoun pled guilty to each charge pursuant to a plea agreement. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9760 - 2017-09-19
)(a), STATS.2 Calhoun pled guilty to each charge pursuant to a plea agreement. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9760 - 2017-09-19
Lacrosse County v. Mark P.
. DYKMAN, J. These are single-judge appeals decided pursuant to § 752.31(2)(e), Stats.[1] Mark P
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10165 - 2005-03-31
. DYKMAN, J. These are single-judge appeals decided pursuant to § 752.31(2)(e), Stats.[1] Mark P
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10165 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. No. 2012AP1293 2 Background In this court’s prior opinion resolving Crenshaw’s direct appeal, we set
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93740 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2012AP1293 2 Background In this court’s prior opinion resolving Crenshaw’s direct appeal, we set
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93740 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
or could have been previously litigated in his prior proceedings; (2) he fails to allege a sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29971 - 2007-08-13
or could have been previously litigated in his prior proceedings; (2) he fails to allege a sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29971 - 2007-08-13
State v. David J.M.
.[2] We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13881 - 2005-03-31
.[2] We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13881 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Catherine J. Farrey v. Russell S. Gonnering
. 95-1385 & 95-2316 -2- PER CURIAM. Catherine J. Farrey appeals from a judgment granting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9557 - 2017-09-19
. 95-1385 & 95-2316 -2- PER CURIAM. Catherine J. Farrey appeals from a judgment granting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9557 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
attorney fees, disallowed pre-judgment interest, No. 2012AP1049 2 and specified the post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103212 - 2017-09-21
attorney fees, disallowed pre-judgment interest, No. 2012AP1049 2 and specified the post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103212 - 2017-09-21
Lacrosse County v. Mark P.
. DYKMAN, J. These are single-judge appeals decided pursuant to § 752.31(2)(e), Stats.[1] Mark P
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10164 - 2005-03-31
. DYKMAN, J. These are single-judge appeals decided pursuant to § 752.31(2)(e), Stats.[1] Mark P
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10164 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Karen A.O.
, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Nos. 95-3075 95-3076 95-3077 95-3078 -2- KAREN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9930 - 2017-09-19
, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Nos. 95-3075 95-3076 95-3077 95-3078 -2- KAREN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9930 - 2017-09-19