Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23731 - 23740 of 29713 for des.
Search results 23731 - 23740 of 29713 for des.
[PDF]
Jeffrey Schwigel v. David J. Kohlmann
, however, we employ a de novo standard of review. Id., ¶¶47-48. No. 04-0588 9 ¶19 “[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7345 - 2017-09-20
, however, we employ a de novo standard of review. Id., ¶¶47-48. No. 04-0588 9 ¶19 “[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7345 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
§ 971.12(1) presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Locke, 177 Wis. 2d 590
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109465 - 2017-09-21
§ 971.12(1) presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Locke, 177 Wis. 2d 590
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109465 - 2017-09-21
Sallie T. v. Milwaukee County Department of Health and Human Services
. 48, we conduct that part of our review de novo. See McEvoy v. Group Health Coop. of Eau Claire, 213
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17176 - 2005-03-31
. 48, we conduct that part of our review de novo. See McEvoy v. Group Health Coop. of Eau Claire, 213
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17176 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
as to “whether those changes are substantial is a question of law which we review de novo.” Id. ¶30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102554 - 2013-10-07
as to “whether those changes are substantial is a question of law which we review de novo.” Id. ¶30
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102554 - 2013-10-07
[PDF]
State v. LaMorris P. Britton
is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion fails to allege sufficient facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11272 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion fails to allege sufficient facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11272 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Barron County v. Kathy S.
due process clause to undisputed facts presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15970 - 2017-09-21
due process clause to undisputed facts presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15970 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
whether a court relied on inaccurate information or an improper factor at sentencing de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=844843 - 2024-09-04
whether a court relied on inaccurate information or an improper factor at sentencing de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=844843 - 2024-09-04
Howard R. Millen v. James Thomas
judgment is de novo. Kallas, 169 Wis.2d at 417, 485 N.W.2d at 280. Summary judgment is appropriate when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9298 - 2005-03-31
judgment is de novo. Kallas, 169 Wis.2d at 417, 485 N.W.2d at 280. Summary judgment is appropriate when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9298 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI App 183
to our de novo review. State v. Cole, 2000 WI App 52, ¶3, 233 Wis. 2d 577, 608 N.W.2d 432
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43539 - 2009-12-15
to our de novo review. State v. Cole, 2000 WI App 52, ¶3, 233 Wis. 2d 577, 608 N.W.2d 432
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43539 - 2009-12-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo.” State v. Joyner, 2002 WI App 250, ¶16, 258 Wis. 2d 249, 653 N.W.2d 290
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000973 - 2025-08-26
of law that we review de novo.” State v. Joyner, 2002 WI App 250, ¶16, 258 Wis. 2d 249, 653 N.W.2d 290
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000973 - 2025-08-26