Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23751 - 23760 of 64778 for b's.
Search results 23751 - 23760 of 64778 for b's.
State v. William J. Kubacki
have required the court to conclude that his PAC was below 0.080%. See § 340.01(46m)(b), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11702 - 2005-03-31
have required the court to conclude that his PAC was below 0.080%. See § 340.01(46m)(b), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11702 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
offense, and that, “[b]ecause in Wisconsin only the state has the power to enact and prosecute crimes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94653 - 2013-03-27
offense, and that, “[b]ecause in Wisconsin only the state has the power to enact and prosecute crimes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94653 - 2013-03-27
2011 WI APP 9
, to order the judgment debtor to appear and answer concerning his or her property. Paragraph (1)(b) extends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57543 - 2011-01-30
, to order the judgment debtor to appear and answer concerning his or her property. Paragraph (1)(b) extends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57543 - 2011-01-30
State v. John A. Lettice
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Vilas County: JAMES B. MOHR, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10249 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Vilas County: JAMES B. MOHR, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10249 - 2005-03-31
State v. Andre Derrick Wingo
the defendant waives a jury in writing or by statement in open court or under s. 967.08(2)(b), on the record
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17460 - 2005-03-31
the defendant waives a jury in writing or by statement in open court or under s. 967.08(2)(b), on the record
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17460 - 2005-03-31
Keith E Broadnax v.
SCR 20:1.5(b),[3] and his failure to refund the client’s $500 retainer violated SCR 20:1.16(d).[4
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17040 - 2005-03-31
SCR 20:1.5(b),[3] and his failure to refund the client’s $500 retainer violated SCR 20:1.16(d).[4
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17040 - 2005-03-31
State v. Javier Salgado
. B. Ineffective Assistance. ¶8 Salgado also claims that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2754 - 2006-02-22
. B. Ineffective Assistance. ¶8 Salgado also claims that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2754 - 2006-02-22
State v. Earl F. Beaver
a motor vehicle while intoxicated in violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(b), second offense. He appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4143 - 2015-07-16
a motor vehicle while intoxicated in violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(b), second offense. He appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4143 - 2015-07-16
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Stephenie Ann T.H.
as the following: (a) The likelihood of the child’s adoption after termination. (b) The age and health
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6156 - 2008-03-13
as the following: (a) The likelihood of the child’s adoption after termination. (b) The age and health
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6156 - 2008-03-13
COURT OF APPEALS
the offender is awaiting imposition of sentence after trial. (b) The categories in par. (a) … include custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35201 - 2009-01-12
the offender is awaiting imposition of sentence after trial. (b) The categories in par. (a) … include custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35201 - 2009-01-12