Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23751 - 23760 of 63595 for records/1000.
Search results 23751 - 23760 of 63595 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.32. Johnson did not file a response. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216170 - 2018-07-24
809.32. Johnson did not file a response. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216170 - 2018-07-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the no-merit report and an independent review of circuit court records, this court concludes that no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212903 - 2018-05-23
the no-merit report and an independent review of circuit court records, this court concludes that no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212903 - 2018-05-23
Otto Mogged v. Margaret A. Mogged
an order entered at the latest hearing in 2002. The record shows that Margaret’s income has increased since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6428 - 2005-03-31
an order entered at the latest hearing in 2002. The record shows that Margaret’s income has increased since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6428 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
barred from arguing his trial and postconviction counsel were ineffective because the record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30954 - 2007-11-19
barred from arguing his trial and postconviction counsel were ineffective because the record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30954 - 2007-11-19
State v. Michael A. Henderson
were ineffective for not challenging the sentence on that basis. Because the record conclusively shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18070 - 2005-05-09
were ineffective for not challenging the sentence on that basis. Because the record conclusively shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18070 - 2005-05-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determination if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we can perceive a reasonable basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107969 - 2017-09-21
determination if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we can perceive a reasonable basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107969 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375334 - 2021-06-09
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375334 - 2021-06-09
State v. Nathan O. Jones
basis to accept his guilty plea at the level of the offense charged. After reviewing the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14024 - 2005-03-31
basis to accept his guilty plea at the level of the offense charged. After reviewing the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14024 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197. The record must show that the court’s discretionary decision had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33222 - 2008-07-01
, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197. The record must show that the court’s discretionary decision had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33222 - 2008-07-01
State v. Antonio Jones
, 547 N.W.2d 806, 809 (Ct. App. 1996). The record must show that the trial court exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14343 - 2005-03-31
, 547 N.W.2d 806, 809 (Ct. App. 1996). The record must show that the trial court exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14343 - 2005-03-31