Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23751 - 23760 of 58546 for speedy trial.

John A. Balcerzak v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioners for the City of Milwaukee
. “On review of a trial court’s decision in a certiorari proceeding, our standard of review is the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14599 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of more than forty grams of cocaine with intent to deliver.[1] Fountain argues his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118785 - 2014-07-30

Frontsheet
testified in their Chapter 980 discharge petition trials. The legislature provided that the Daubert
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133152 - 2015-01-19

[PDF] Frontsheet
to the State's expert witnesses who testified in their Chapter 980 discharge petition trials
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133152 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
homicide, with use of a dangerous weapon following a jury trial. He also appeals from the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701789 - 2023-09-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction, following a jury trial, of one count of armed robbery as a party to a crime and one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237984 - 2019-03-26

COURT OF APPEALS
on Garrow’s counterclaim for unpaid fuel invoices. Following a four-day trial, the circuit court also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89862 - 2012-11-29

[PDF] State v. Dale Gruen
, contrary to §§ 346.63(1)(a) & 346.65(2), STATS. Gruen claims the trial court erred when it denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11395 - 2017-09-19

Mary H. Staehler v. Jennifer L. Beuthin
to Staehler, awarding $2989.67 in medical expenses and awarding nothing for pain and suffering. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10030 - 2005-03-31

State v. Everardo A. Lopez
for a jury trial. Lopez’s attorney told the court that he did not think Lopez understood what the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3256 - 2005-03-31