Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23751 - 23760 of 58509 for speedy trial.
Search results 23751 - 23760 of 58509 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Michael Lorentz appeals a judgment, entered following a jury trial, that convicted him of one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247838 - 2019-10-01
Michael Lorentz appeals a judgment, entered following a jury trial, that convicted him of one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247838 - 2019-10-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
homicide, with use of a dangerous weapon following a jury trial. He also appeals from the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701789 - 2023-09-12
homicide, with use of a dangerous weapon following a jury trial. He also appeals from the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701789 - 2023-09-12
[PDF]
Mary H. Staehler v. Jennifer L. Beuthin
nothing for pain and suffering. The trial court entered judgment on the verdict. Staehler filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10030 - 2017-09-19
nothing for pain and suffering. The trial court entered judgment on the verdict. Staehler filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10030 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) his right to confrontation was violated by the admission, at trial, of a police body camera video
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939524 - 2025-04-10
) his right to confrontation was violated by the admission, at trial, of a police body camera video
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939524 - 2025-04-10
State v. Trisha M. Waupoose
, 939.05 and 961.48.[1] Waupoose contends that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16249 - 2005-03-31
, 939.05 and 961.48.[1] Waupoose contends that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16249 - 2005-03-31
Physicians Plus Insurance Corporation v. Midwest Mutual Insurance Company
Timothy Smith.[1] The trial court concluded that the County, the Town, and the Frankes each had a duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2782 - 2005-03-31
Timothy Smith.[1] The trial court concluded that the County, the Town, and the Frankes each had a duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2782 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Physicians Plus Insurance Corporation v. Midwest Mutual Insurance Company
Timothy Smith.1 The trial court concluded 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2782 - 2017-09-19
Timothy Smith.1 The trial court concluded 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2782 - 2017-09-19
State v. Victor Naydihor
the following: 1) a Machner[2] hearing to determine whether trial counsel was ineffective during resentencing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16568 - 2005-03-31
the following: 1) a Machner[2] hearing to determine whether trial counsel was ineffective during resentencing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16568 - 2005-03-31
State v. Victor Naydihor
the following: 1) a Machner[2] hearing to determine whether trial counsel was ineffective during resentencing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16567 - 2005-03-31
the following: 1) a Machner[2] hearing to determine whether trial counsel was ineffective during resentencing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16567 - 2005-03-31
Michael Ives v. Coopertools
Academy of Trial Lawyers. Amicus curiae brief was filed by Terry J. Booth and Fellows, Piper
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17005 - 2005-03-31
Academy of Trial Lawyers. Amicus curiae brief was filed by Terry J. Booth and Fellows, Piper
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17005 - 2005-03-31