Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23761 - 23770 of 29713 for des.
Search results 23761 - 23770 of 29713 for des.
State v. Dale Steinbach
constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, reviewed de novo by this court. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10716 - 2005-03-31
constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, reviewed de novo by this court. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10716 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
legal standard is a question of law we decide de novo. Gittel v. Abram, 2002 WI App 113, ¶41, 255 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145492 - 2017-09-21
legal standard is a question of law we decide de novo. Gittel v. Abram, 2002 WI App 113, ¶41, 255 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145492 - 2017-09-21
State v. Derrick C. Montriel
a defendant is entitled to sentence credit pursuant to § 973.155 is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7289 - 2005-03-31
a defendant is entitled to sentence credit pursuant to § 973.155 is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7289 - 2005-03-31
Rock County v. Amy L.
of law that we review de novo. Id. at 236-37, 548 N.W.2d at 76. The required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14169 - 2005-03-31
of law that we review de novo. Id. at 236-37, 548 N.W.2d at 76. The required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14169 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257595 - 2020-04-15
for ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257595 - 2020-04-15
[PDF]
Mary H. Staehler v. Jennifer L. Beuthin
that the plaintiff’s injuries were de minimis or nonexistent. Id. Here, the jury may well have concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10030 - 2017-09-19
that the plaintiff’s injuries were de minimis or nonexistent. Id. Here, the jury may well have concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10030 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 15
interpretation is a question of law subject to de novo review. Harnischfeger Corp. v. LIRC, 196 Wis. 2d 650
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92339 - 2014-09-15
interpretation is a question of law subject to de novo review. Harnischfeger Corp. v. LIRC, 196 Wis. 2d 650
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92339 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 849 N.W.2d 693. We review de novo the circuit court’s determination that the neighbors’ complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026784 - 2025-10-23
, 849 N.W.2d 693. We review de novo the circuit court’s determination that the neighbors’ complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026784 - 2025-10-23
Elizabeth P. v. Mark R.F.
(2),[3] Stats., and reviewing the legal issues de novo. Id. Analysis John P
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12008 - 2005-03-31
(2),[3] Stats., and reviewing the legal issues de novo. Id. Analysis John P
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12008 - 2005-03-31
State v. Glen D. Hollister
of law that we review de novo. See id. The residual hearsay exception may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13077 - 2005-03-31
of law that we review de novo. See id. The residual hearsay exception may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13077 - 2005-03-31