Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23761 - 23770 of 55892 for n y c.
Search results 23761 - 23770 of 55892 for n y c.
John P. Catlin v. Kirstin A. Catlin
correctly applied the 29% figure found in § DWD 40.03(1)(c) to John’s weekly $2,080 income, yielding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5358 - 2005-03-31
correctly applied the 29% figure found in § DWD 40.03(1)(c) to John’s weekly $2,080 income, yielding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5358 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carlos Perez
of the presence of the weapon." We reasoned in Asfoor that "[c]oncealing or hiding a weapon precludes
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17572 - 2005-03-31
of the presence of the weapon." We reasoned in Asfoor that "[c]oncealing or hiding a weapon precludes
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17572 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 111
for Milwaukee County: ELSA C. LAMELAS, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86691 - 2014-09-15
for Milwaukee County: ELSA C. LAMELAS, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86691 - 2014-09-15
Peter D. Griffin v. Judy P. Smith
; (c) The right to be heard and to present witnesses; (d) The right to present documentary evidence; (e
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16543 - 2005-03-31
; (c) The right to be heard and to present witnesses; (d) The right to present documentary evidence; (e
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16543 - 2005-03-31
State v. Leroy K. Kuhnke
unless the findings are clearly erroneous. State v. Knight, 168 Wis.2d 509, 514 n.2, 484 N.W.2d 540, 542
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12494 - 2005-03-31
unless the findings are clearly erroneous. State v. Knight, 168 Wis.2d 509, 514 n.2, 484 N.W.2d 540, 542
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12494 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
)(a) and § 973.09(5)(c). When a probationer is discharged from probation, the DOC is to complete and send one
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131915 - 2017-09-21
)(a) and § 973.09(5)(c). When a probationer is discharged from probation, the DOC is to complete and send one
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131915 - 2017-09-21
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Charles K. Krombach
in violation of SCR 20:8.4(c).[1] Count II alleged a violation of former SCR 20:1.15(d)[2] by Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20749 - 2005-12-21
in violation of SCR 20:8.4(c).[1] Count II alleged a violation of former SCR 20:1.15(d)[2] by Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20749 - 2005-12-21
[PDF]
State v. Leroy K. Kuhnke
unless the findings are clearly erroneous. State v. Knight, 168 Wis.2d 509, 514 n.2, 484 N.W.2d 540
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12494 - 2017-09-21
unless the findings are clearly erroneous. State v. Knight, 168 Wis.2d 509, 514 n.2, 484 N.W.2d 540
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12494 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Duane S. Jorgensen v. Water Works, Inc.
in a manner that is illegal, oppressive or fraudulent. (c) That the shareholders are deadlocked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12626 - 2017-09-21
in a manner that is illegal, oppressive or fraudulent. (c) That the shareholders are deadlocked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12626 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the order—“[c]omplete a psychological or psychiatric evaluation.” The evaluation was, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=555766 - 2022-08-16
in the order—“[c]omplete a psychological or psychiatric evaluation.” The evaluation was, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=555766 - 2022-08-16