Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23761 - 23770 of 63933 for records/1000.
Search results 23761 - 23770 of 63933 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239882 - 2019-04-25
the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239882 - 2019-04-25
State v. Sherman Williams
motive on Williams's part. This reasoned conclusion by the trial court is based on the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9024 - 2005-03-31
motive on Williams's part. This reasoned conclusion by the trial court is based on the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9024 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James L. Kirk
attorney did not provide him with discovery under WIS. STAT. § 971.23. The record belies this claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6644 - 2017-09-20
attorney did not provide him with discovery under WIS. STAT. § 971.23. The record belies this claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6644 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Nathan O. Jones
plea at the level of the offense charged. After reviewing the record, we disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14024 - 2014-09-15
plea at the level of the offense charged. After reviewing the record, we disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14024 - 2014-09-15
City of Racine v. Robert Robinson
trial and instead seeking a review of the forfeiture judgment based on the record of the municipal court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9113 - 2005-03-31
trial and instead seeking a review of the forfeiture judgment based on the record of the municipal court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9113 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon our independent review of the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118670 - 2014-07-29
a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon our independent review of the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118670 - 2014-07-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that the order may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108955 - 2017-09-21
of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that the order may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108955 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the Record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=819266 - 2024-07-03
the Record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=819266 - 2024-07-03
[PDF]
Harlan Richards v. Jerry Smith
unsupported by facts of record, and violated his constitutional protections. We disagree and affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3433 - 2017-09-19
unsupported by facts of record, and violated his constitutional protections. We disagree and affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3433 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and did not do so. We have independently reviewed the records and the no-merit report as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632086 - 2023-03-14
, and did not do so. We have independently reviewed the records and the no-merit report as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632086 - 2023-03-14