Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23761 - 23770 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 23761 - 23770 of 58483 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Norman O. Brown
For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the trial court on the suppression issues and most of the plea issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12714 - 2017-09-21
For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the trial court on the suppression issues and most of the plea issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12714 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joshua Slagoski
a postconviction order denying his motion for sentence modification. He contends that the trial court sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2690 - 2005-03-31
a postconviction order denying his motion for sentence modification. He contends that the trial court sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2690 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion seeking a new trial. ¶2 The jury was persuaded that Taylor sexually fondled his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243422 - 2019-07-10
postconviction motion seeking a new trial. ¶2 The jury was persuaded that Taylor sexually fondled his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243422 - 2019-07-10
State v. Paul R. Maxey
NETTESHEIM, P.J. We have previously granted the State’s petition for leave to appeal from a trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5215 - 2005-03-31
NETTESHEIM, P.J. We have previously granted the State’s petition for leave to appeal from a trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5215 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kevin M. Boon
a jury trial, and from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5992 - 2005-03-31
a jury trial, and from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5992 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shelton Love
, but acquitted his alleged accomplice, who had raised the defense of misidentification. The trial court entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13130 - 2005-03-31
, but acquitted his alleged accomplice, who had raised the defense of misidentification. The trial court entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13130 - 2005-03-31
State v. Norman O. Brown
] For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the trial court on the suppression issues and most of the plea issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12714 - 2005-03-31
] For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the trial court on the suppression issues and most of the plea issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12714 - 2005-03-31
State v. Norman O. Brown
] For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the trial court on the suppression issues and most of the plea issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12715 - 2005-03-31
] For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the trial court on the suppression issues and most of the plea issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12715 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Joseph and June Albert v. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District
The cases were consolidated for trial. In an unsigned motion in limine attached to its pretrial report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16259 - 2017-09-21
The cases were consolidated for trial. In an unsigned motion in limine attached to its pretrial report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16259 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Wilfred E. Tobias
Agency of Tomahawk. At trial, the prosecution relied in part on incriminating statements Tobias made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8597 - 2017-09-19
Agency of Tomahawk. At trial, the prosecution relied in part on incriminating statements Tobias made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8597 - 2017-09-19