Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23771 - 23780 of 62077 for child support.
Search results 23771 - 23780 of 62077 for child support.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial constitutes a waiver” of a jury trial. In support, R & R cites to the following from our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862533 - 2024-10-16
trial constitutes a waiver” of a jury trial. In support, R & R cites to the following from our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862533 - 2024-10-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
applicable test, we need not resolve whether the record supports the circuit court’s view
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108746 - 2017-09-21
applicable test, we need not resolve whether the record supports the circuit court’s view
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108746 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
remaining sentences; (2) there was substantial evidence to support revocation; and (3) alternatives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29840 - 2007-07-30
remaining sentences; (2) there was substantial evidence to support revocation; and (3) alternatives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29840 - 2007-07-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
failed to determine whether reasonable suspicion supported the stop of his vehicle. Second, he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=661120 - 2023-05-25
failed to determine whether reasonable suspicion supported the stop of his vehicle. Second, he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=661120 - 2023-05-25
CA Blank Order
. 738, 744 (1967). The no-merit report addresses: (1) whether the evidence was sufficient to support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101201 - 2013-08-19
. 738, 744 (1967). The no-merit report addresses: (1) whether the evidence was sufficient to support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101201 - 2013-08-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as a fruit of the illegal search. Because we conclude that the warrant was supported by probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135364 - 2017-09-21
as a fruit of the illegal search. Because we conclude that the warrant was supported by probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135364 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
be suppressed as a fruit of the illegal search. Because we conclude that the warrant was supported by probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135364 - 2015-02-24
be suppressed as a fruit of the illegal search. Because we conclude that the warrant was supported by probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135364 - 2015-02-24
COURT OF APPEALS
, supported a determination that Gaetz no longer met the criteria for commitment as a sexually violent person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88073 - 2012-10-10
, supported a determination that Gaetz no longer met the criteria for commitment as a sexually violent person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88073 - 2012-10-10
COURT OF APPEALS
to support the jury’s finding. Alternatively, West argues he is entitled to a new trial because the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28690 - 2007-04-09
to support the jury’s finding. Alternatively, West argues he is entitled to a new trial because the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28690 - 2007-04-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
also contends that sufficient evidence did not support the jury’s verdict. We affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114086 - 2017-09-21
also contends that sufficient evidence did not support the jury’s verdict. We affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114086 - 2017-09-21