Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23781 - 23790 of 56213 for n y c.

[PDF] Frontsheet
)(a) and § 973.09(5)(c). When a probationer is discharged from probation, the DOC is to complete and send one
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131915 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 15
. STAT. § 66.0413(1)(c). In other words, the standard is “whether the cost of repairs exceeds 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=494872 - 2022-05-10

State v. Carlos Perez
of the presence of the weapon." We reasoned in Asfoor that "[c]oncealing or hiding a weapon precludes
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17572 - 2005-03-31

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Charles K. Krombach
in violation of SCR 20:8.4(c).[1] Count II alleged a violation of former SCR 20:1.15(d)[2] by Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20749 - 2005-12-21

Commercial Union Midwest Insurance Company v. Lynn K. Vorbeck and Lynn K. Vorbeck
. Sep. 12, 2003) (No. 01-1347); Van Erden v. Sobczak, 2003 WI App 57, ¶21 n.3, 260 Wis. 2d 881, 659 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6051 - 2005-03-31

Peter D. Griffin v. Judy P. Smith
; (c) The right to be heard and to present witnesses; (d) The right to present documentary evidence; (e
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16543 - 2005-03-31

John P. Catlin v. Kirstin A. Catlin
correctly applied the 29% figure found in § DWD 40.03(1)(c) to John’s weekly $2,080 income, yielding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5358 - 2005-03-31

State v. Leroy K. Kuhnke
unless the findings are clearly erroneous. State v. Knight, 168 Wis.2d 509, 514 n.2, 484 N.W.2d 540, 542
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12494 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
has a mental disorder. (c) The person is dangerous to others because the person’s mental disorder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53874 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] John P. Catlin v. Kirstin A. Catlin
). There are three children, and the court correctly applied the 29% figure found in § DWD 40.03(1)(c) to John’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5358 - 2017-09-19