Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23781 - 23790 of 46056 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 23781 - 23790 of 46056 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of a DNA test. Alternatively, the petition alleged that Lietz’s trial attorney was constitutionally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622248 - 2023-02-14
of a DNA test. Alternatively, the petition alleged that Lietz’s trial attorney was constitutionally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622248 - 2023-02-14
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy J. Schlitt
). We now turn to the second prong in the Strickland test. The second prong asks whether “counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9178 - 2017-09-19
). We now turn to the second prong in the Strickland test. The second prong asks whether “counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9178 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
There is also no indication that the District engaged in any balancing test in its denial, and no specific
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737381 - 2023-12-06
There is also no indication that the District engaged in any balancing test in its denial, and no specific
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737381 - 2023-12-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, a convicted person must satisfy the two-prong test set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989780 - 2025-07-29
, a convicted person must satisfy the two-prong test set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989780 - 2025-07-29
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
evidence at the trial or having items tested prior to trial in favor of sticking to the originally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050941 - 2025-12-17
evidence at the trial or having items tested prior to trial in favor of sticking to the originally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050941 - 2025-12-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with eight tinfoil packets or bindles. Chemical testing was performed on two of the eight bindles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728166 - 2023-11-14
with eight tinfoil packets or bindles. Chemical testing was performed on two of the eight bindles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728166 - 2023-11-14
State v. James D. Turner, Jr.
, this court need not address the prejudice prong of the ineffectiveness test. See State v. Hubanks, 173 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8077 - 2005-03-31
, this court need not address the prejudice prong of the ineffectiveness test. See State v. Hubanks, 173 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8077 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
times, stating “[t]he reasonableness test goes to whether a reasonable person would be disturbed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66366 - 2014-09-15
times, stating “[t]he reasonableness test goes to whether a reasonable person would be disturbed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66366 - 2014-09-15
State v. Joseph Bogdanske
to the hospital for a blood tests and treatment of his injuries.[2] The hospital treated him for three broken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2324 - 2005-03-31
to the hospital for a blood tests and treatment of his injuries.[2] The hospital treated him for three broken
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2324 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
not prove the prejudice prong of the Strickland test. This court also rejects Huck’s ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15525 - 2017-09-21
not prove the prejudice prong of the Strickland test. This court also rejects Huck’s ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15525 - 2017-09-21