Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23791 - 23800 of 30021 for de.
Search results 23791 - 23800 of 30021 for de.
State v. Justice C. Granger
, whether a defendant’s Miranda rights were violated is a constitutional fact that we determine de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13477 - 2005-03-31
, whether a defendant’s Miranda rights were violated is a constitutional fact that we determine de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13477 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
; whether counsel’s conduct constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001470 - 2025-08-26
; whether counsel’s conduct constitutes ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001470 - 2025-08-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 248 Wis. 2d 297, 635 N.W.2d 797. ¶17 We review de novo the decision of the municipality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928523 - 2025-03-18
, 248 Wis. 2d 297, 635 N.W.2d 797. ¶17 We review de novo the decision of the municipality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928523 - 2025-03-18
State v. Jeffrey Brunet
this deficient performance prejudiced the defense are issues of law which we decide de novo. See id. at 236-37
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10518 - 2005-03-31
this deficient performance prejudiced the defense are issues of law which we decide de novo. See id. at 236-37
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10518 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Steven Theuer v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
application to undisputed facts are questions of law that courts generally review under a de novo standard.4
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16377 - 2017-09-21
application to undisputed facts are questions of law that courts generally review under a de novo standard.4
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16377 - 2017-09-21
State v. Everett W. Mosher
is in custody for Miranda purposes is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Buck, 210 Wis.2d 115
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13349 - 2005-03-31
is in custody for Miranda purposes is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Buck, 210 Wis.2d 115
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13349 - 2005-03-31
Patricia K. Bernhardt v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
an employee engaged in misconduct under § 108.04(5) is a legal conclusion, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10149 - 2005-03-31
an employee engaged in misconduct under § 108.04(5) is a legal conclusion, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10149 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roger H. Leiskau
denied the motion. Although we review the record de novo for purposes of deciding whether to grant a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8522 - 2005-03-31
denied the motion. Although we review the record de novo for purposes of deciding whether to grant a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8522 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
SCR CHAPTER 21
whether to investigate and to prosecute de minimis violations. Discretion permits the office
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032720 - 2025-10-30
whether to investigate and to prosecute de minimis violations. Discretion permits the office
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032720 - 2025-10-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶14 We review de novo the circuit court’s decision to deny James’ petition for discharge filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699307 - 2023-09-06
¶14 We review de novo the circuit court’s decision to deny James’ petition for discharge filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699307 - 2023-09-06