Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23791 - 23800 of 29823 for des.
Search results 23791 - 23800 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
State v. William E. Marberry
The interpretation and application of statutes to undisputed facts are questions of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14594 - 2017-09-21
The interpretation and application of statutes to undisputed facts are questions of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14594 - 2017-09-21
LeBakken Rent-To-Own v. David J. Warnell
review de novo. See Yauger v. Skiing Enters., 206 Wis.2d 76, 80, 557 N.W.2d 60, 61 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14095 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See Yauger v. Skiing Enters., 206 Wis.2d 76, 80, 557 N.W.2d 60, 61 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14095 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
Voces de la Frontera, Inc v. Dave Gerber Does Wis. Stat. ch. 818 govern the authority of a sheriff
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071210 - 2026-01-28
Voces de la Frontera, Inc v. Dave Gerber Does Wis. Stat. ch. 818 govern the authority of a sheriff
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071210 - 2026-01-28
State v. Victor Naydihor
which we review de novo. State v. Church, 2002 WI App 212, ¶16, __ Wis. 2d __, 650 N.W.2d 873. ¶24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4609 - 2005-03-31
which we review de novo. State v. Church, 2002 WI App 212, ¶16, __ Wis. 2d __, 650 N.W.2d 873. ¶24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4609 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Northern States Power Company v. National Gas Company, Inc.
627, 654, 517 N.W.2d 432, 443 (1994). We review questions of law de novo, while benefiting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15609 - 2017-09-21
627, 654, 517 N.W.2d 432, 443 (1994). We review questions of law de novo, while benefiting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15609 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and denying Elnimeiry’s motion to modify child support. ¶20 Elnimeiry timely moved for a de novo hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773791 - 2024-03-07
and denying Elnimeiry’s motion to modify child support. ¶20 Elnimeiry timely moved for a de novo hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773791 - 2024-03-07
State v. Harry L. Seymer
a defendant’s right of confrontation is a question of law that we review de novo. See Williams, 253 Wis. 2d 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17655 - 2005-05-24
a defendant’s right of confrontation is a question of law that we review de novo. See Williams, 253 Wis. 2d 99
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17655 - 2005-05-24
William N. Ledford v. Circuit Court for Dane County
that we review de novo. See State ex rel. Richards v. Circuit Court, 165 Wis.2d 551, 554, 478 N.W.2d 29
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15358 - 2005-03-31
that we review de novo. See State ex rel. Richards v. Circuit Court, 165 Wis.2d 551, 554, 478 N.W.2d 29
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15358 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 193
review is de novo. The State concedes that Robinson labels the query a question of law, but notes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29733 - 2007-08-27
review is de novo. The State concedes that Robinson labels the query a question of law, but notes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29733 - 2007-08-27
Patricia K. Bernhardt v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
an employee engaged in misconduct under § 108.04(5) is a legal conclusion, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10149 - 2005-03-31
an employee engaged in misconduct under § 108.04(5) is a legal conclusion, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10149 - 2005-03-31