Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23791 - 23800 of 29713 for des.
Search results 23791 - 23800 of 29713 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for effective assistance is a legal question reviewed de novo. Id. ¶14 Johnnie’s ineffective-assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120102 - 2014-09-15
for effective assistance is a legal question reviewed de novo. Id. ¶14 Johnnie’s ineffective-assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120102 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Prent Corporation v. Martek Holdings, Inc.
document is a question of law that we review de novo. See Edwards v. Petrone, 160 Wis. 2d 255, 258, 465
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14896 - 2017-09-21
document is a question of law that we review de novo. See Edwards v. Petrone, 160 Wis. 2d 255, 258, 465
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14896 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
is deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118314 - 2014-07-29
is deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo. Jeannie M.P., 286 Wis. 2d 721, ¶6. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118314 - 2014-07-29
State v. Paul L. Bathe
. We review this determination de novo as a question of law. If the trial court determines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6370 - 2005-03-31
. We review this determination de novo as a question of law. If the trial court determines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6370 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
briefs in the matter." No. 2007AP776-D 11 which we review de novo. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171050 - 2017-09-21
briefs in the matter." No. 2007AP776-D 11 which we review de novo. In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171050 - 2017-09-21
Marshall E. Begel v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances. UFE, Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis. 2d 274, 284, 548
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2799 - 2005-03-31
deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances. UFE, Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis. 2d 274, 284, 548
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2799 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
performance is deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Jeannie M. P., 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97440 - 2013-06-04
performance is deficient or prejudicial is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Jeannie M. P., 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97440 - 2013-06-04
WI App 130 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP133 Complete Title of...
and apply it to undisputed facts. This is a question of law that we review de novo. Andersen v. DNR, 2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88647 - 2012-11-28
and apply it to undisputed facts. This is a question of law that we review de novo. Andersen v. DNR, 2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88647 - 2012-11-28
Roy S. Thorp v. Town of Lebanon
for relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. Irby v. Macht, 184 Wis.2d at 836, 522 N.W.2d at 11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11327 - 2005-03-31
for relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. Irby v. Macht, 184 Wis.2d at 836, 522 N.W.2d at 11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11327 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
“acted according to law.” ¶8 Because our review of the Common Council’s decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70007 - 2011-08-17
“acted according to law.” ¶8 Because our review of the Common Council’s decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70007 - 2011-08-17