Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2381 - 2390 of 17366 for Cost.
Search results 2381 - 2390 of 17366 for Cost.
John W. Fritsch v. Premier Investors, LLC
erred by awarding interest on the Fritsches’ earnest money and double costs pursuant to Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25193 - 2006-05-22
erred by awarding interest on the Fritsches’ earnest money and double costs pursuant to Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25193 - 2006-05-22
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
such as restitution, court cost[s, ]etc.” and sought an order preventing the DOC from taking said “deductions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989608 - 2025-07-30
such as restitution, court cost[s, ]etc.” and sought an order preventing the DOC from taking said “deductions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989608 - 2025-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS
for an assessment of costs, fees, and reasonable attorney’s fees. Background ¶2 In March 2009, Jeffrey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58407 - 2010-12-29
for an assessment of costs, fees, and reasonable attorney’s fees. Background ¶2 In March 2009, Jeffrey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58407 - 2010-12-29
[PDF]
Frontsheet
for reinstatement should be granted. We also agree with the referee that the costs of the reinstatement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=328735 - 2021-01-26
for reinstatement should be granted. We also agree with the referee that the costs of the reinstatement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=328735 - 2021-01-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
costs or [attorney] fees incurred” in the matter. ¶5 At a subsequent status hearing, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333141 - 2021-02-09
costs or [attorney] fees incurred” in the matter. ¶5 At a subsequent status hearing, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333141 - 2021-02-09
[PDF]
Frontsheet
costs of the proceeding, which are $2,067.67 as of January 17, 2018. The OLR does not seek
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211325 - 2018-04-18
costs of the proceeding, which are $2,067.67 as of January 17, 2018. The OLR does not seek
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211325 - 2018-04-18
[PDF]
Mary Fredette v. Wood County National Bank
of costs and attorney fees under § 814.025, STATS. Fredette was a residual beneficiary under Frank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8713 - 2017-09-19
of costs and attorney fees under § 814.025, STATS. Fredette was a residual beneficiary under Frank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8713 - 2017-09-19
Melanie Guth v. Timothy Guth
for costs and actual attorney fees in this custody and placement dispute. Melanie argues that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3846 - 2005-03-31
for costs and actual attorney fees in this custody and placement dispute. Melanie argues that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3846 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
¶2 At issue was whether Zurich’s policy afforded coverage to Bulk for the cost of groundwater
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27077 - 2014-09-15
¶2 At issue was whether Zurich’s policy afforded coverage to Bulk for the cost of groundwater
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27077 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reject Bluemound’s contention that by naming witnesses concerning the cost-to-cure deficiencies
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105738 - 2017-09-21
reject Bluemound’s contention that by naming witnesses concerning the cost-to-cure deficiencies
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105738 - 2017-09-21