Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2381 - 2390 of 29713 for des.
Search results 2381 - 2390 of 29713 for des.
State Public Defender v. Circuit Court for Fond Du Lac County
. An appellate court is not bound by a trial court's conclusions of law and decides the matter de novo. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8248 - 2005-03-31
. An appellate court is not bound by a trial court's conclusions of law and decides the matter de novo. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8248 - 2005-03-31
Gary Wistrom v. Employers Insurance of Wausau
summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3613 - 2005-03-31
summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3613 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ronald J. Rucks v. George Burnett
questions of law de novo. See Monicken, 226 Wis.2d at 125, 593 N.W.2d at 512. A person may be held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15035 - 2017-09-21
questions of law de novo. See Monicken, 226 Wis.2d at 125, 593 N.W.2d at 512. A person may be held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15035 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
principles to the findings of fact de novo.” State v. Smiter, 2011 WI App 15, ¶9, 331 Wis. 2d 431, 793 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894743 - 2024-12-26
principles to the findings of fact de novo.” State v. Smiter, 2011 WI App 15, ¶9, 331 Wis. 2d 431, 793 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894743 - 2024-12-26
Ralph W. Hutchens, Sr. v. Daniel R. Simonson
, which we review de novo. Long v. Ardestani, 2001 WI App 46, ¶36, 241 Wis. 2d 498, 624 N.W.2d 405
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7495 - 2005-03-31
, which we review de novo. Long v. Ardestani, 2001 WI App 46, ¶36, 241 Wis. 2d 498, 624 N.W.2d 405
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7495 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law subject to our de novo review, as is the meaning of plain contract language. Lynch v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52581 - 2010-07-27
is a question of law subject to our de novo review, as is the meaning of plain contract language. Lynch v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52581 - 2010-07-27
State v. Shawn H.
, because this court’s function is to correct legal errors. Therefore, we will review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12717 - 2005-03-31
, because this court’s function is to correct legal errors. Therefore, we will review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12717 - 2005-03-31
State v. Clifton M. Wright
or statutory rights were violated is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. at 86, 522 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10817 - 2005-03-31
or statutory rights were violated is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. at 86, 522 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10817 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Application of a statute to a set of facts presents a question of law subject to de novo review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143483 - 2015-06-29
. Application of a statute to a set of facts presents a question of law subject to de novo review. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143483 - 2015-06-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 602. Whether ambiguity exists in a contract is a question of law reviewed de novo. Mattheis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843356 - 2024-08-28
N.W.2d 602. Whether ambiguity exists in a contract is a question of law reviewed de novo. Mattheis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843356 - 2024-08-28