Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2381 - 2390 of 58483 for speedy trial.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. 2 We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 After a trial spanning three days, a jury found Chappell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125500 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. A second jury trial was held approximately eighteen months later on the State’s ch. 980 petition. Budd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42252 - 2009-10-14

[PDF] NOTICE
judgment in an opinion issued on October 4, 2007. A second jury trial was held approximately eighteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42252 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 7, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of ...
“the final judgment or order, entered on 6/22/10.” That judgment imposed a $1000 fine after the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65333 - 2011-06-06

[PDF] State v. Adrian L. Williams
argues that the trial court should have permitted him to withdraw his guilty pleas because the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15283 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court found that Reimer violated WIS. ADMIN. CODE § NR 216.46(1), because he did not develop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65333 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
and reconsideration.1 The issues are whether sentence modification is warranted for the trial court’s alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44871 - 2014-09-15

State v. Nicholas Leair
appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Leair argues (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4782 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Nicholas Leair
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Leair argues (1) the trial court improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4782 - 2017-09-19

State v. Damonta J. Jones
appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Jones claims the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18288 - 2005-05-31