Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23801 - 23810 of 29817 for des.
Search results 23801 - 23810 of 29817 for des.
Woody Howland v. BG Products, Inc.
such as Grams v. Boss, 97 Wis. 2d 332, 338, 294 N.W.2d 473 (1980). Our review is de novo and independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15942 - 2005-03-31
such as Grams v. Boss, 97 Wis. 2d 332, 338, 294 N.W.2d 473 (1980). Our review is de novo and independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15942 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
Voces de la Frontera, Inc v. Dave Gerber Does Wis. Stat. ch. 818 govern the authority of a sheriff
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071210 - 2026-01-28
Voces de la Frontera, Inc v. Dave Gerber Does Wis. Stat. ch. 818 govern the authority of a sheriff
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071210 - 2026-01-28
2007 WI APP 142
of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the brief of Marcella De Peters, Milwaukee. Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28883 - 2007-06-26
of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the brief of Marcella De Peters, Milwaukee. Respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28883 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts satisfy the statutory standard is a question of law that we review de novo.” Waukesha County v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798395 - 2024-05-07
the facts satisfy the statutory standard is a question of law that we review de novo.” Waukesha County v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798395 - 2024-05-07
Anthony Fuchsgruber v. Custom Accessories, Inc.
of the amended Wis. Stat. § 895.045(1). We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. Nelson v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17424 - 2005-03-31
of the amended Wis. Stat. § 895.045(1). We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. Nelson v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17424 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s performance was deficient and if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151649 - 2017-09-21
counsel’s performance was deficient and if so, prejudicial, are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151649 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo.” See State v. Salinas, 2016 WI 44, ¶30, 369 Wis. 2d 9, 879 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174731 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that we review de novo.” See State v. Salinas, 2016 WI 44, ¶30, 369 Wis. 2d 9, 879 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174731 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Monroe County Department of Human Services v. Kelli B.
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v Allen M., 214 Wis. 2d 302, 313, 571 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6036 - 2017-09-19
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v Allen M., 214 Wis. 2d 302, 313, 571 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6036 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Rite-Hite Corporation v. Board of Review of the Village of Brown Deer
court's thoughtful and comprehensive written decision, our review is de novo. See id., 164 Wis.2d at 42
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11657 - 2017-09-19
court's thoughtful and comprehensive written decision, our review is de novo. See id., 164 Wis.2d at 42
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11657 - 2017-09-19
Patricia K. Bernhardt v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
an employee engaged in misconduct under § 108.04(5) is a legal conclusion, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10149 - 2005-03-31
an employee engaged in misconduct under § 108.04(5) is a legal conclusion, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10149 - 2005-03-31