Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23811 - 23820 of 29823 for des.

Rite-Hite Corporation v. Board of Review of the Village of Brown Deer
by the trial court's thoughtful and comprehensive written decision, our review is de novo. See id., 164 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11657 - 2005-03-31

WI App 55 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP507-CR Complete Titl...
de novo. Zellner v. Cedarburg Sch. Dist., 2007 WI 53, ¶16, 300 Wis. 2d 290, 731 N.W.2d 240. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80923 - 2013-04-25

Marshall E. Begel v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances. UFE, Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis. 2d 274, 284, 548
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2799 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
satisfy the statutory standards, however, is a question of law that is reviewed de novo. Marathon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739052 - 2023-12-13

COURT OF APPEALS
consider de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990). To demonstrate deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90012 - 2012-12-03

Sallie T. v. Milwaukee County Department of Health and Human Services
. 48, we conduct that part of our review de novo. See McEvoy v. Group Health Coop. of Eau Claire, 213
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17176 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 56
on this statutory-interpretation appeal is de novo. See Village of Shorewood v. Steinberg, 174 Wis. 2d 191, 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111193 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo.” State v. Joyner, 2002 WI App 250, ¶16, 258 Wis. 2d 249, 653 N.W.2d 290
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000973 - 2025-08-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143066 - 2017-09-21

State v. Everett W. Mosher
is in custody for Miranda purposes is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Buck, 210 Wis.2d 115
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13349 - 2005-03-31