Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23811 - 23820 of 74552 for public records.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of A...
whether objectively viewed, the record before the warrant-issuing judge provided “sufficient facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90932 - 2012-12-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that he reviewed Robert’s “medical records from the time that [he] had been hospitalized, so [he] saw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=440107 - 2021-10-12

[PDF] CA Blank Order
114 821 W. State Street Milwaukee, WI 53233 Christopher P. August Assistant State Public
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=354345 - 2021-04-13

City of Mequon v. Kenneth Hosale
building permit and assessment requirements. The record supports the grant of summary judgment to the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11907 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Leea N. Power v. James M. Muhammad
regarding a tape Muhammad wanted admitted in the record; and (3) the trial court failed to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17971 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
the postconviction motion is legally insufficient.”). “[A]n evidentiary hearing is not mandatory if the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133770 - 2015-01-28

COURT OF APPEALS
video recordings of police interviews with the alleged victims. Jones is charged with two counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38471 - 2009-07-28

[PDF] City of Mequon v. Sarah J. Peacock
shirt was carrying a gun.” Id. The police had no audio recording of the call nor did they know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5348 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI 111
that the association shall promote the public interest by maintaining high standards of conduct in the legal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29855 - 2014-09-15

Kelly F. Mulder v. MSI Insurance Company
and in accordance with the facts of record.’” Lievrouw v. Roth, 157 Wis.2d 332, 348, 459 N.W.2d 850, 855 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11043 - 2005-03-31