Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23811 - 23820 of 59339 for quit claim deed.
Search results 23811 - 23820 of 59339 for quit claim deed.
State v. Leslie K. Dent
offense of maintaining a drug trafficking place. He claims his due process rights were violated because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15284 - 2005-03-31
offense of maintaining a drug trafficking place. He claims his due process rights were violated because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15284 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
(1994). In March 2011, Anderson filed a motion to dismiss in the circuit court, renewing his claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95456 - 2013-04-15
(1994). In March 2011, Anderson filed a motion to dismiss in the circuit court, renewing his claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95456 - 2013-04-15
State v. Leslie K. Dent
offense of maintaining a drug trafficking place. He claims his due process rights were violated because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15285 - 2005-03-31
offense of maintaining a drug trafficking place. He claims his due process rights were violated because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15285 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
there would be arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court misused its sentencing discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100696 - 2013-08-25
there would be arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court misused its sentencing discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100696 - 2013-08-25
[PDF]
State v. Maurice D. Harris
by counsel’s failure to file a motion to compel discovery because one was not needed. As for Harris’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5765 - 2017-09-19
by counsel’s failure to file a motion to compel discovery because one was not needed. As for Harris’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5765 - 2017-09-19
Durand Cooperatives v. Dennis Emmert
of $1,232.12. They claim that the judgment, based on the cost of seed received by them from Durand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12417 - 2005-03-31
of $1,232.12. They claim that the judgment, based on the cost of seed received by them from Durand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12417 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was taken into custody for a parole violation, and Davis claims that his parole agent took his glasses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134620 - 2017-09-21
was taken into custody for a parole violation, and Davis claims that his parole agent took his glasses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134620 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
subject matter jurisdiction over the armed burglary charge. Beaudoin does not pursue that claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142690 - 2017-09-21
subject matter jurisdiction over the armed burglary charge. Beaudoin does not pursue that claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142690 - 2017-09-21
State v. Paul L. George
). In his response, George claims that his counsel compelled him to plead guilty. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10506 - 2005-03-31
). In his response, George claims that his counsel compelled him to plead guilty. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10506 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dan E. Holman
. § 946.49(1)(a) (1999-2000).[2] He claims that the bail condition imposed violated his constitutional right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4341 - 2005-03-31
. § 946.49(1)(a) (1999-2000).[2] He claims that the bail condition imposed violated his constitutional right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4341 - 2005-03-31