Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23811 - 23820 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 23811 - 23820 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Mark B. Watts v. The Medical Protective Company
, the calculation of damages, and recusal of the trial judge. Because we affirm on the negligence-related issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14992 - 2005-03-31
, the calculation of damages, and recusal of the trial judge. Because we affirm on the negligence-related issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14992 - 2005-03-31
State v. David C. Tutlewski
and the order denying postconviction relief and remand for a new trial. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14455 - 2005-03-31
and the order denying postconviction relief and remand for a new trial. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14455 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joshua Slagoski
a postconviction order denying his motion for sentence modification. He contends that the trial court sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2690 - 2005-03-31
a postconviction order denying his motion for sentence modification. He contends that the trial court sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2690 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joshua Slagoski
his motion for sentence modification. He contends that the trial court sentenced him on the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2690 - 2017-09-19
his motion for sentence modification. He contends that the trial court sentenced him on the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2690 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Mark B. Watts v. The Medical Protective Company
, the calculation of damages, and recusal of the trial judge. Because we affirm on the negligence-related issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14992 - 2017-09-21
, the calculation of damages, and recusal of the trial judge. Because we affirm on the negligence-related issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14992 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Norman O. Brown
For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the trial court on the suppression issues and most of the plea issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12715 - 2017-09-21
For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the trial court on the suppression issues and most of the plea issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12715 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for possession of a firearm by a felon. Nimmer pled guilty after the trial No. 2020AP878-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=313491 - 2020-12-15
for possession of a firearm by a felon. Nimmer pled guilty after the trial No. 2020AP878-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=313491 - 2020-12-15
[PDF]
State v. Kevin M. Boon
), following a jury trial, and from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5992 - 2017-09-19
), following a jury trial, and from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5992 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. David D. Masini
that the trial court erred when it decided not to dismiss a juror for cause. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13181 - 2017-09-21
that the trial court erred when it decided not to dismiss a juror for cause. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13181 - 2017-09-21
Tommy Ponchik v. Jody Bradley
argument because we agree that the trial court lacked competency to entertain Ponchik’s certiorari action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7019 - 2005-03-31
argument because we agree that the trial court lacked competency to entertain Ponchik’s certiorari action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7019 - 2005-03-31