Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23821 - 23830 of 84383 for case number.
Search results 23821 - 23830 of 84383 for case number.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the area where the offender may be found, (3) the number of people in the area, (4) the known or probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98081 - 2013-06-18
of the area where the offender may be found, (3) the number of people in the area, (4) the known or probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98081 - 2013-06-18
[PDF]
WI APP 48
2012 WI APP 48 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2011AP933
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79440 - 2014-09-15
2012 WI APP 48 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2011AP933
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79440 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that it will be substantially prejudiced. Id. at 288-89. In Shanks, we specified a number of factors that should be considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29035 - 2007-05-15
that it will be substantially prejudiced. Id. at 288-89. In Shanks, we specified a number of factors that should be considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29035 - 2007-05-15
[PDF]
State v. Erin K.S.
and inconsistent for a healthy child development and that there were a number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5107 - 2017-09-19
and inconsistent for a healthy child development and that there were a number
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5107 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Kurt W. Warrington
review of a third issue: whether the State must prove in an OMVWI case that the blood testing equipment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8078 - 2017-09-19
review of a third issue: whether the State must prove in an OMVWI case that the blood testing equipment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8078 - 2017-09-19
State v. James Gruentzel
of greatest importance, which may vary from case to case. Id., ¶41. The trial court must also describe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6934 - 2005-03-31
of greatest importance, which may vary from case to case. Id., ¶41. The trial court must also describe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6934 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that Stark’s affidavit “does not include any new evidence in this case.” It therefore denied Hathaway’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52856 - 2010-08-02
that Stark’s affidavit “does not include any new evidence in this case.” It therefore denied Hathaway’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52856 - 2010-08-02
State v. David Sautier
was important to the trial court was Sautier’s pattern of criminal conduct, not the exact number of juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11280 - 2005-03-31
was important to the trial court was Sautier’s pattern of criminal conduct, not the exact number of juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11280 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
judge commented that his phone bill does not reflect the numbers of incoming calls. The judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32746 - 2008-05-20
judge commented that his phone bill does not reflect the numbers of incoming calls. The judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32746 - 2008-05-20
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. This case stems from the nonrenewal of the employment contract of Thomas Lechnir
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136900 - 2015-03-10
PER CURIAM. This case stems from the nonrenewal of the employment contract of Thomas Lechnir
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136900 - 2015-03-10