Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23821 - 23830 of 62778 for child support.
Search results 23821 - 23830 of 62778 for child support.
[PDF]
NOTICE
the evidence supports the municipal court decision. Because the record reveals that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53981 - 2014-09-15
the evidence supports the municipal court decision. Because the record reveals that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53981 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. The issue on appeal is whether the evidence supports the municipal court decision. Because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53981 - 2010-09-07
. The issue on appeal is whether the evidence supports the municipal court decision. Because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53981 - 2010-09-07
State v. Jordan A.C.
. The confession is therefore inadequate to support the adjudication and, accordingly, this court reverses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13144 - 2012-09-26
. The confession is therefore inadequate to support the adjudication and, accordingly, this court reverses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13144 - 2012-09-26
COURT OF APPEALS
, but erred when it refused to consider Rao’s offer of evidence supporting punitive damages. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28612 - 2007-03-28
, but erred when it refused to consider Rao’s offer of evidence supporting punitive damages. Accordingly, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28612 - 2007-03-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
of evidence supporting punitive damages. Accordingly, we affirm the court’s order striking WMAS’ answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28612 - 2014-09-15
of evidence supporting punitive damages. Accordingly, we affirm the court’s order striking WMAS’ answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28612 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). Because we conclude that there is sufficient evidence to support the adjudication of delinquency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307015 - 2020-11-25
). Because we conclude that there is sufficient evidence to support the adjudication of delinquency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307015 - 2020-11-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Brown contends that: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the finding that Brown used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239678 - 2019-04-25
. Brown contends that: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the finding that Brown used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239678 - 2019-04-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
against him and that the evidence was insufficient to support the order. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291553 - 2020-09-29
against him and that the evidence was insufficient to support the order. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291553 - 2020-09-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. That postconviction motion alleged there was insufficient evidence to support White’s conviction for possession
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898631 - 2025-01-08
. That postconviction motion alleged there was insufficient evidence to support White’s conviction for possession
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898631 - 2025-01-08
COURT OF APPEALS
the applicable regulations and because substantial evidence supports its decision, we affirm. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90134 - 2012-12-05
the applicable regulations and because substantial evidence supports its decision, we affirm. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90134 - 2012-12-05