Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23821 - 23830 of 29832 for des.
Search results 23821 - 23830 of 29832 for des.
[PDF]
State v. John S. Cooper
review de novo. See State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754, 623 N.W.2d 528, cert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5588 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. See State v. Piddington, 2001 WI 24, ¶13, 241 Wis. 2d 754, 623 N.W.2d 528, cert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5588 - 2017-09-19
Roy S. Thorp v. Town of Lebanon
for relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. Irby v. Macht, 184 Wis.2d at 836, 522 N.W.2d at 11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11327 - 2005-03-31
for relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. Irby v. Macht, 184 Wis.2d at 836, 522 N.W.2d at 11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11327 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Avery L. Dallapiazza
is a question of “constitutional fact” that we review de novo. Id., 131 Wis. 2d at 283, 389 N.W.2d at 30. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4615 - 2017-09-19
is a question of “constitutional fact” that we review de novo. Id., 131 Wis. 2d at 283, 389 N.W.2d at 30. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4615 - 2017-09-19
WI App 29 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP453-CR Complete Title ...
they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether those facts warrant suppression. See id. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108162 - 2014-03-25
they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether those facts warrant suppression. See id. ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108162 - 2014-03-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
standard to apply presents an issue of law, which we review de novo. Republic Bank of Chicago v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41677 - 2014-09-15
standard to apply presents an issue of law, which we review de novo. Republic Bank of Chicago v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41677 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
, Handley points to Jimmie R.R., which sets forth the de novo standard of review for this particular
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984177 - 2025-07-17
, Handley points to Jimmie R.R., which sets forth the de novo standard of review for this particular
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984177 - 2025-07-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Goethems now appeal. DISCUSSION ¶16 We review de novo the grant of summary judgment, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=278767 - 2020-08-18
Goethems now appeal. DISCUSSION ¶16 We review de novo the grant of summary judgment, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=278767 - 2020-08-18
Terri L. Knowles v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
. The Knowleses appeal. ANALYSIS ¶12 We review an order granting summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4235 - 2005-03-31
. The Knowleses appeal. ANALYSIS ¶12 We review an order granting summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4235 - 2005-03-31
Michael Jungbluth v. Hometown, Inc.
a question of law. J.A.L. v. State, 162 Wis. 2d 940, 962, 471 N.W.2d 493 (1991). As such, we employ a de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16916 - 2005-03-31
a question of law. J.A.L. v. State, 162 Wis. 2d 940, 962, 471 N.W.2d 493 (1991). As such, we employ a de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16916 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of Review ¶11 We consider de novo whether a postconviction motion on its face alleges material facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76950 - 2014-09-15
of Review ¶11 We consider de novo whether a postconviction motion on its face alleges material facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76950 - 2014-09-15