Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23821 - 23830 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 23821 - 23830 of 64042 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
violates Wis. Stat. Rule 809.19(1)(e) by failing to provide any citation to the record in his argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29402 - 2007-06-18
violates Wis. Stat. Rule 809.19(1)(e) by failing to provide any citation to the record in his argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29402 - 2007-06-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
supplemental no-merit report. After an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248082 - 2019-10-09
supplemental no-merit report. After an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248082 - 2019-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS
barred from arguing his trial and postconviction counsel were ineffective because the record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30954 - 2007-11-19
barred from arguing his trial and postconviction counsel were ineffective because the record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30954 - 2007-11-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144518 - 2017-09-21
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144518 - 2017-09-21
Laura K. Waterhouse v. Thomas A. Waterhouse
Waterhouse’s child support payment records.[1] The court determined the agency was barred by the doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18094 - 2005-05-09
Waterhouse’s child support payment records.[1] The court determined the agency was barred by the doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18094 - 2005-05-09
Ellen M. Gleason v. Richard J. Gleason
.2d 151 (1986). Because the record supplies ample evidence for the trial court’s decision to deviate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5162 - 2005-03-31
.2d 151 (1986). Because the record supplies ample evidence for the trial court’s decision to deviate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5162 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375334 - 2021-06-09
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375334 - 2021-06-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 974.06 (2015-16) 1 motion after a hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216444 - 2018-08-01
. § 974.06 (2015-16) 1 motion after a hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216444 - 2018-08-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=741286 - 2023-12-19
. Upon our independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=741286 - 2023-12-19
[PDF]
Brown County Department of Health & Social Services v. Samantha E.
. 1 Brown County brought a motion to supplement the record to show evidence that Samantha had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12180 - 2017-09-21
. 1 Brown County brought a motion to supplement the record to show evidence that Samantha had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12180 - 2017-09-21