Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23821 - 23830 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 23821 - 23830 of 64042 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for sentence modification. After reviewing the record, No. 2017AP671-CR 2 we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206146 - 2017-12-21
for sentence modification. After reviewing the record, No. 2017AP671-CR 2 we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206146 - 2017-12-21
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that these cases are appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123014 - 2014-10-07
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that these cases are appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123014 - 2014-10-07
Walter L. Merten v. Department of Transportation
not reverse a trial court’s discretionary act if the record reflects a reasonable basis for the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2723 - 2005-03-31
not reverse a trial court’s discretionary act if the record reflects a reasonable basis for the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2723 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and independently reviewing the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207806 - 2018-01-31
and independently reviewing the record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207806 - 2018-01-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of discretion in concluding that the records sought were not material. State v. Henderson, No. 00-2506
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30675 - 2014-09-15
of discretion in concluding that the records sought were not material. State v. Henderson, No. 00-2506
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30675 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to respond and has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190766 - 2017-09-21
to respond and has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190766 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780038 - 2024-03-26
an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780038 - 2024-03-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
placement order. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804986 - 2024-05-23
placement order. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804986 - 2024-05-23
CA Blank Order
report and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99709 - 2013-07-17
report and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99709 - 2013-07-17
COURT OF APPEALS
) Menacher’s personal bankruptcy, (2) the general disarray of the records, and (3) an insurance company’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99971 - 2013-07-30
) Menacher’s personal bankruptcy, (2) the general disarray of the records, and (3) an insurance company’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99971 - 2013-07-30