Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23831 - 23840 of 62778 for child support.
Search results 23831 - 23840 of 62778 for child support.
State v. Larenzo M.C.
stay of execution. Larenzo contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6819 - 2005-03-31
stay of execution. Larenzo contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6819 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, this court may not substitute its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85866 - 2014-09-15
the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, this court may not substitute its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85866 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
search warrants were not supported by probable cause. We reject Sedlak’s narrow argument because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172913 - 2017-09-21
search warrants were not supported by probable cause. We reject Sedlak’s narrow argument because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172913 - 2017-09-21
Wayne L. Koenig v. Donald Aldrich
written title. There is insufficient evidence to support the claim and, consequently, the Complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21309 - 2006-02-06
written title. There is insufficient evidence to support the claim and, consequently, the Complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21309 - 2006-02-06
State v. Peter J. Pronold
was not supported by probable cause.[1] When an appellant contends that a warrant was not supported by probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14935 - 2005-03-31
was not supported by probable cause.[1] When an appellant contends that a warrant was not supported by probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14935 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Wayne L. Koenig v. Donald Aldrich
ten years under written title. There is insufficient evidence to support the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21309 - 2017-09-21
ten years under written title. There is insufficient evidence to support the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21309 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
substantial evidence supports its decision, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 During all time periods relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90134 - 2014-09-15
substantial evidence supports its decision, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 During all time periods relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90134 - 2014-09-15
State v. Xhevat Tahiri
a hearing because Tahiri had not timely filed a brief and supporting affidavits in support of the motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11704 - 2005-03-31
a hearing because Tahiri had not timely filed a brief and supporting affidavits in support of the motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11704 - 2005-03-31
Urban A. Hubert, Jr. v. Gary R. McCaughtry
to support the finding of the disciplinary committee. By major conduct report dated April 26, 1996, Hubert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12157 - 2005-03-31
to support the finding of the disciplinary committee. By major conduct report dated April 26, 1996, Hubert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12157 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Leonard E. Wille
when it held that probable cause existed to support his arrest. We uphold the trial court’s ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14606 - 2017-09-21
when it held that probable cause existed to support his arrest. We uphold the trial court’s ruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14606 - 2017-09-21