Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23831 - 23840 of 29713 for des.

[PDF] State v. Gregory Robinson
of law the appellate court reviews de novo. State v. Behnke, 203 Wis. 2d 43, 62, 553 N.W.2d 265 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3878 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Jerome G. Semrau
that we review de novo. See Kania v. Airborne Freight Corp., 99 Wis. 2d 746, 758-59, 300 N.W.2d 63
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14850 - 2017-09-21

2007 WI APP 115
questions of law that we review de novo. See Warehouse II, LLC v. DOT, 2006 WI 62, ¶4, 291 Wis. 2d 80, 715
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28269 - 2007-04-26

[PDF] Warren L. Blakslee v. General Motors Corporation
) (citation omitted). Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14800 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Kristin Galatowitsch v. James Wanat
. No. 00-0199 6 contract language presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2179 - 2017-09-19

State v. Robert J. Defliger
in evaluating the sufficiency of a criminal complaint or information, which is a question of law we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4277 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether those facts warrant suppression. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93377 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 202
. Our review of Judge Murray’s interpretation and application of § 968.26 is de novo. See State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29722 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Joyce A. Devenport v. Paper Recycling Company
was recreational as defined by statute. ¶8 We review the grant or denial of a motion for summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15330 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 217, 738 N.W.2d 114 (citation omitted). We review de novo the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242977 - 2019-07-02