Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23841 - 23850 of 36155 for e's.

State v. Vickie L. Shipler
” of a defendant to jail. We specifically noted in Eastman that “[w]e do not address whether the trial court could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2747 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
Here, the court stated: [E]ven if one were to determine that [the evidence] would be relevant … I would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32750 - 2008-05-19

[PDF] State v. Jacquelyn A. LoPiccolo
, and LoPiccolo responded, “[W]e got what we want.” LoPiccolo’s husband left the apartment without saying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20008 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in which her body was found the day after she disappeared. ¶3 “[W]e will not overturn a jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183707 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] 05-01 Amendment to Supreme Court Rules relating to Cost Assessments in the Lawyer Regulation System (Effective 7-1-06)
. (e) Prior discipline, if any. (f) Other relevant circumstances. Section 2. SCR 22.24 (2
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24996 - 2017-09-21

2010 WI APP 161
), (e). However, § 973.046 expressly authorizes the DNA surcharge only in cases in which “a court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56896 - 2015-01-29

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. § 961.41(3g)(e) (2011-12). 2 He now appeals from the judgment of conviction. Jones’s postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121750 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. WISCONSIN STAT. § 909.02(9) provides that “[e]xtrinsic evidence of authenticity as a condition precedent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164519 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Thomas C. Holden
2 Judge Nancy E. Wheeler presided over the motion hearing. Holden’s trial was conducted before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11183 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Karl Grunewald
the knowledge or consent of his clients violated SCR 20:1.6(a).4 (e) His misrepresentations to successor
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16381 - 2017-09-21