Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23841 - 23850 of 63981 for records/1000.
Search results 23841 - 23850 of 63981 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Daniel E. La Fave
decision to plead guilty. Because the record supports the trial court's findings of fact and those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8695 - 2017-09-19
decision to plead guilty. Because the record supports the trial court's findings of fact and those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8695 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=721832 - 2023-11-01
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=721832 - 2023-11-01
State v. Jewel C.
-correcting court” and reviews the record to address any alleged “errors” of the trial court. Cook v. Cook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4094 - 2005-03-31
-correcting court” and reviews the record to address any alleged “errors” of the trial court. Cook v. Cook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4094 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252370 - 2020-01-14
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252370 - 2020-01-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the Record, we conclude that the order 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=770136 - 2024-02-28
review of the Record, we conclude that the order 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=770136 - 2024-02-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2022AP15-CRNM 2 but he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731333 - 2023-11-21
. No. 2022AP15-CRNM 2 but he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731333 - 2023-11-21
[PDF]
Vances H. Smith v. Gary McCaughtry
Smith argues that the record contains no evidence that a voice call was made before cell count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10048 - 2017-09-19
Smith argues that the record contains no evidence that a voice call was made before cell count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10048 - 2017-09-19
State v. Ben F. Oldakowski
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13929 - 2005-03-31
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13929 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Barbara J. Anderson
of its discretion in denying modification. The record reveals that when it imposed sentence on June 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4336 - 2017-09-19
of its discretion in denying modification. The record reveals that when it imposed sentence on June 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4336 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
on this appeal. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110459 - 2014-04-14
on this appeal. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110459 - 2014-04-14