Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23851 - 23860 of 29796 for des.
Search results 23851 - 23860 of 29796 for des.
Alyce M. Drea v. David Duren
judgment in Duren's favor. SUMMARY JUDGMENT We review summary judgments de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8325 - 2005-03-31
judgment in Duren's favor. SUMMARY JUDGMENT We review summary judgments de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8325 - 2005-03-31
Howard R. Millen v. James Thomas
judgment is de novo. Kallas, 169 Wis.2d at 417, 485 N.W.2d at 280. Summary judgment is appropriate when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9298 - 2005-03-31
judgment is de novo. Kallas, 169 Wis.2d at 417, 485 N.W.2d at 280. Summary judgment is appropriate when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9298 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Curtis M. Agacki
, which we review de novo. See Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537, 345 N.W.2d 389
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13317 - 2017-09-21
, which we review de novo. See Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd., 117 Wis.2d 529, 537, 345 N.W.2d 389
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13317 - 2017-09-21
State v. Calvin Pluim
of the magistrate’s probable cause determination is not de novo, even though it presents a question of law; rather, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15225 - 2005-03-31
of the magistrate’s probable cause determination is not de novo, even though it presents a question of law; rather, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15225 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
…. Whether joinder is proper under § 971.12(1) presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109465 - 2014-03-26
…. Whether joinder is proper under § 971.12(1) presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109465 - 2014-03-26
Terri L. Knowles v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
. The Knowleses appeal. ANALYSIS ¶12 We review an order granting summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4235 - 2005-03-31
. The Knowleses appeal. ANALYSIS ¶12 We review an order granting summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4235 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 68
137 (1997). We review the referee's conclusions of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29319 - 2014-09-15
137 (1997). We review the referee's conclusions of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29319 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 86
the Commission’s order is de novo. See City of Brookfield v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission, 87 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83767 - 2014-09-15
the Commission’s order is de novo. See City of Brookfield v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission, 87 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83767 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Patricia K. Bernhardt v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
§ 108.04(5) is a legal conclusion, which we review de novo. See Charette v. LIRC, 196 Wis.2d 956, 959
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10149 - 2017-09-19
§ 108.04(5) is a legal conclusion, which we review de novo. See Charette v. LIRC, 196 Wis.2d 956, 959
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10149 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
James Allen v. Juan Guerrero
is a question of law No. 03-1356 5 that we decide de novo. Arneson v. Jezwinski, 225 Wis. 2d 371
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6506 - 2017-09-19
is a question of law No. 03-1356 5 that we decide de novo. Arneson v. Jezwinski, 225 Wis. 2d 371
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6506 - 2017-09-19