Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23861 - 23870 of 37781 for d's.
Search results 23861 - 23870 of 37781 for d's.
Town of Jackson v. James A. O'Hearn
, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. James A. O’Hearn, d/b/a Native American Bison Country Ltd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13556 - 2005-03-31
, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. James A. O’Hearn, d/b/a Native American Bison Country Ltd
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13556 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for Washburn County: EUGENE D. HARRINGTON, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part, and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59541 - 2011-01-31
for Washburn County: EUGENE D. HARRINGTON, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part, and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59541 - 2011-01-31
State v. Tyeshawn D. Cohens
. Tyeshawn D. Cohens, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6543 - 2005-03-31
. Tyeshawn D. Cohens, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6543 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eric J. Yelk
Yelk’s claim because at the plea hearing Yelk confirmed that he “ha[d] enough time to discuss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11855 - 2005-03-31
Yelk’s claim because at the plea hearing Yelk confirmed that he “ha[d] enough time to discuss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11855 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
-Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Polk County: Eugene D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143666 - 2015-06-29
-Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Polk County: Eugene D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143666 - 2015-06-29
COURT OF APPEALS
)(d). The agent is not required, however, to consider all of the factors listed in the regulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57806 - 2010-12-20
)(d). The agent is not required, however, to consider all of the factors listed in the regulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57806 - 2010-12-20
COURT OF APPEALS
was not ineffective and Shrum “ha[d] not shown any good cause or substantial reasoning or basis to withdraw his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65995 - 2011-06-20
was not ineffective and Shrum “ha[d] not shown any good cause or substantial reasoning or basis to withdraw his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65995 - 2011-06-20
COURT OF APPEALS
is presented. Id. “[D]ue process for a convicted defendant permits him or her a single appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33114 - 2008-06-23
is presented. Id. “[D]ue process for a convicted defendant permits him or her a single appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33114 - 2008-06-23
[PDF]
Jerrold W. Odness v. Dunn County Bd of Adjustment
to the community,” as required under ORDINANCE § 9.2.03(d)7. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶5 A decision of a zoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21773 - 2017-09-21
to the community,” as required under ORDINANCE § 9.2.03(d)7. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶5 A decision of a zoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21773 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ricky McMorris
grounds. “[D]ouble jeopardy bars a retrial when the defendant has successfully moved for a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18274 - 2005-05-24
grounds. “[D]ouble jeopardy bars a retrial when the defendant has successfully moved for a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18274 - 2005-05-24