Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23861 - 23870 of 29827 for des.
Search results 23861 - 23870 of 29827 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Donavan D. Theno
is a question of law which we review de novo without deference to the trial court’s conclusion. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16027 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law which we review de novo without deference to the trial court’s conclusion. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16027 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous. WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2). We review de novo the court’s application of those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967607 - 2025-06-11
they are clearly erroneous. WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2). We review de novo the court’s application of those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967607 - 2025-06-11
John K. Bille v. Christine Zuraff
of law that we review de novo. See id. Classification of the residence determines whether Gloria could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8456 - 2005-03-31
of law that we review de novo. See id. Classification of the residence determines whether Gloria could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8456 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief. Id. This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93205 - 2013-02-26
that, if true, would entitle the defendant to relief. Id. This is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93205 - 2013-02-26
Charles Johnson v. Rogers Memorial Hospital, Inc.
& Shipping, 202 Wis. 2d 138, 142, 549 N.W.2d 714, 715 (1996). We review questions of law de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13636 - 2005-03-31
& Shipping, 202 Wis. 2d 138, 142, 549 N.W.2d 714, 715 (1996). We review questions of law de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13636 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Armstrong, 223 Wis. 2d 331, 345, 352-353, 588 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30948 - 2007-11-20
is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Armstrong, 223 Wis. 2d 331, 345, 352-353, 588 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30948 - 2007-11-20
COURT OF APPEALS
“acted according to law.” ¶8 Because our review of the Common Council’s decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70007 - 2011-08-17
“acted according to law.” ¶8 Because our review of the Common Council’s decision is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70007 - 2011-08-17
Warren L. Blakslee v. General Motors Corporation
278 (Ct. App. 1994) (citation omitted). Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14800 - 2005-03-31
278 (Ct. App. 1994) (citation omitted). Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14800 - 2005-03-31
Brennan v. Berner Cheese Corporation
review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Machotka v. Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6899 - 2005-03-31
review summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Machotka v. Village
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6899 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stephen L. Jensen
interpretation, which we review de novo. State v. Bodoh, 226 Wis. 2d 718, 724, 595 N.W.2d 330 (1999). Our
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17453 - 2005-03-31
interpretation, which we review de novo. State v. Bodoh, 226 Wis. 2d 718, 724, 595 N.W.2d 330 (1999). Our
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17453 - 2005-03-31