Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23861 - 23870 of 34729 for in n.

[PDF] State v. Reginold B. Trussell
are “all male, all black.” ¶18 “[I]n assessing whether officers had the requisite reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15732 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, ¶21, 241 Wis. 2d 729, 623 N.W.2d 516 (“[I]n some circumstances, an informant’s veracity can afford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196467 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Tecia D.B.
County DHSS v. Julie A.B., 2002 WI 95, ¶30, 255 Wis. 2d 170, 648 N.W.2d 402. Further, “[i]n every case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6835 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Dean P. Lenz
to, is essentially the same as the “clearly erroneous” standard. State v. Mitchell, 167 Wis.2d 672, 682 n.1, 428
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15246 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Angel E.
. Schumacher, 144 Wis.2d 388, 408 n.14, 424 N.W.2d 672, 680 (1988) (court of appeals lacks the power to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9886 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. DANE COUNTY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, V. N. W., RESPONDENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245852 - 2019-08-29

[PDF] CA Blank Order
old, 5’2”, thi[]n build, dark complexion [and] clean shaven.” The hearing revealed, however
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226064 - 2018-10-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Hindsley, 2000 WI App 130, ¶22 & n.13, 237 Wis. 2d 358, 614 N.W.2d 48. DISCUSSION ¶8 Hogan contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112449 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. State v. Kelty, 2006 WI 101, ¶18 & n.11, 294 Wis. 2d 62, 716 N.W.2d 886. Accordingly, further pursuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858751 - 2024-10-08

State v. Hank J. Merten
. 2d 931, 934 n.3 (W.D. Tenn. 2003). An individual that is excluded under § 1320a-7 is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5329 - 2005-03-31