Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23861 - 23870 of 63986 for records/1000.
Search results 23861 - 23870 of 63986 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Randy J. Stahl
2003 restitution hearings, the only restitution order in the record is for $965, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26339 - 2017-09-21
2003 restitution hearings, the only restitution order in the record is for $965, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26339 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and the record, we affirm the order of the circuit court. John and Barbara Balke were divorced in August 13
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97884 - 2014-09-15
and the record, we affirm the order of the circuit court. John and Barbara Balke were divorced in August 13
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97884 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Nathan O. Jones
plea at the level of the offense charged. After reviewing the record, we disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14024 - 2014-09-15
plea at the level of the offense charged. After reviewing the record, we disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14024 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Dorian Williams
the motion without a hearing if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7370 - 2017-09-20
the motion without a hearing if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7370 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197808 - 2017-10-18
, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197808 - 2017-10-18
COURT OF APPEALS
. The record does not support this view. ¶7 Greenwood appears to be focused on several statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57858 - 2010-12-15
. The record does not support this view. ¶7 Greenwood appears to be focused on several statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57858 - 2010-12-15
CA Blank Order
on this appeal. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110459 - 2014-04-14
on this appeal. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110459 - 2014-04-14
State v. Ben F. Oldakowski
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13929 - 2005-03-31
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13929 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case No. 2018AP2373-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248856 - 2019-10-16
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case No. 2018AP2373-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248856 - 2019-10-16
[PDF]
State v. David Mikel
not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11017 - 2017-09-19
not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11017 - 2017-09-19