Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23861 - 23870 of 64013 for records/1000.
Search results 23861 - 23870 of 64013 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
barred from arguing his trial and postconviction counsel were ineffective because the record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30954 - 2007-11-19
barred from arguing his trial and postconviction counsel were ineffective because the record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30954 - 2007-11-19
[PDF]
State v. Joeval M. Jones
the request for a different lawyer. After discussing various portions of the record, the court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21429 - 2017-09-21
the request for a different lawyer. After discussing various portions of the record, the court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21429 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259154 - 2020-04-30
record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment that there are no arguably
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259154 - 2020-04-30
Steven Wadzinski v. Roger Daleidan
.13 (1993). Here, the record does not show an identity of issues between the Wadzinski-Adamses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13620 - 2005-03-31
.13 (1993). Here, the record does not show an identity of issues between the Wadzinski-Adamses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13620 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102564 - 2013-09-30
. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102564 - 2013-09-30
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude there is no arguable basis for appeal. The record discloses no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100362 - 2013-08-05
of the record, we conclude there is no arguable basis for appeal. The record discloses no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100362 - 2013-08-05
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
review of the briefs and Record, we No. 2024AP973 2 conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084937 - 2026-03-04
review of the briefs and Record, we No. 2024AP973 2 conclude at conference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084937 - 2026-03-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=741286 - 2023-12-19
. Upon our independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=741286 - 2023-12-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2022AP15-CRNM 2 but he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731333 - 2023-11-21
. No. 2022AP15-CRNM 2 but he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731333 - 2023-11-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Miller’s sentence, the record reflects a proper exercise of sentencing discretion. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114604 - 2017-09-21
Miller’s sentence, the record reflects a proper exercise of sentencing discretion. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114604 - 2017-09-21