Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23871 - 23880 of 63981 for records/1000.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
-CRNM 2 response. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252498 - 2020-01-13

[PDF] State v. Cory D. Klicko
agreement as set forth on the record prior to the plea hearing, and claiming that counsel should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16112 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501472 - 2022-03-29

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and an order denying his motion to modify sentence. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106027 - 2017-09-21

Laura K. Waterhouse v. Thomas A. Waterhouse
Waterhouse’s child support payment records.[1] The court determined the agency was barred by the doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18094 - 2005-05-09

[PDF] NOTICE
. The record must show that the court’s 1 All subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33222 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on the facts of record and the relevant law. Id., ¶3. The circuit court should “specify the objectives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=202700 - 2017-11-21

[PDF] NOTICE
the filing of the petitions as required by WIS. STAT. § 48.90(2). The record is devoid of any facts which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35407 - 2014-09-15

Carroll S. Piepiora v. Susan Piepiora
, reasoned decision applying the correct legal standard to the facts of record. Sellers v. Sellers, 201 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6400 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
in the record supports his underlying premise that he was charged under the three strikes penalty enhancer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123537 - 2014-10-14