Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23871 - 23880 of 82897 for simple case search.
Search results 23871 - 23880 of 82897 for simple case search.
James R. Koby v. La Crosse County Circuit Court
not apply in criminal cases. We do not address that question, however, because we conclude that Koby had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4966 - 2005-03-31
not apply in criminal cases. We do not address that question, however, because we conclude that Koby had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4966 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of operating while intoxicated in a separate case, No. 2010CT727. In exchange, the State moved to dismiss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104491 - 2013-11-13
of operating while intoxicated in a separate case, No. 2010CT727. In exchange, the State moved to dismiss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104491 - 2013-11-13
Patricia L. Guy v. Golden Gate Funeral Home
. Guy appeals pro se from an order dismissing her case against Golden Gate Funeral Home, Maudie Love
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7553 - 2005-03-31
. Guy appeals pro se from an order dismissing her case against Golden Gate Funeral Home, Maudie Love
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7553 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Patrick C. Webster
and affirm. In Dane County case no. 95-CF-349, the State charged Webster, as a repeater, with a theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13369 - 2017-09-21
and affirm. In Dane County case no. 95-CF-349, the State charged Webster, as a repeater, with a theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13369 - 2017-09-21
State v. Leporld L. Miller
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8511 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8511 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Patrick C. Webster
and affirm. In Dane County case no. 95-CF-349, the State charged Webster, as a repeater, with a theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13367 - 2017-09-21
and affirm. In Dane County case no. 95-CF-349, the State charged Webster, as a repeater, with a theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13367 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Patrick C. Webster
and affirm. In Dane County case no. 95-CF-349, the State charged Webster, as a repeater, with a theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13368 - 2017-09-21
and affirm. In Dane County case no. 95-CF-349, the State charged Webster, as a repeater, with a theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13368 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
operated his vehicle normally. The court denied Fuller’s motion, stating: [I]t is a close case but I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30593 - 2014-09-15
operated his vehicle normally. The court denied Fuller’s motion, stating: [I]t is a close case but I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30593 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
motion, stating: [I]t is a close case but I do believe you factor in the two forty-five a.m. time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30593 - 2007-10-15
motion, stating: [I]t is a close case but I do believe you factor in the two forty-five a.m. time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30593 - 2007-10-15
[PDF]
James R. Koby v. La Crosse County Circuit Court
not apply in criminal cases. We do not address that question, however, because we conclude that Koby had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4966 - 2017-09-19
not apply in criminal cases. We do not address that question, however, because we conclude that Koby had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4966 - 2017-09-19