Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23871 - 23880 of 83258 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 23871 - 23880 of 83258 for simple case search/1000.
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
and his trial counsel testified. Trial counsel testified that he did not treat Kachelski’s case any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12447 - 2005-03-31
and his trial counsel testified. Trial counsel testified that he did not treat Kachelski’s case any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12447 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas Deffke
judge pursuant to § 752.31(2), STATS. No. 96-0154-CR -2- I. BACKGROUND This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10255 - 2017-09-20
judge pursuant to § 752.31(2), STATS. No. 96-0154-CR -2- I. BACKGROUND This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10255 - 2017-09-20
State v. Thomas Deffke
affirms. I. BACKGROUND This case arises from the events surrounding a high school
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10255 - 2005-03-31
affirms. I. BACKGROUND This case arises from the events surrounding a high school
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10255 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Supreme Court rules petition 10-03
representation, and the private bar therefore no more than 33% of indigent clients in those cases. WIS. STAT
/supreme/docs/1003petition.pdf - 2010-03-10
representation, and the private bar therefore no more than 33% of indigent clients in those cases. WIS. STAT
/supreme/docs/1003petition.pdf - 2010-03-10
[PDF]
2021AP001450 - Motion to Recuse Justice Protasiewicz filed by Wisconsin Legislature, Petitioners, and Congressmen
Counsel Listed on Following Page FILED 01-29-2024 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2021AP001450
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1450_012924motionrecuse.pdf - 2024-01-30
Counsel Listed on Following Page FILED 01-29-2024 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2021AP001450
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1450_012924motionrecuse.pdf - 2024-01-30
[PDF]
State v. Todd S. Meske
. This was the standard procedure used to refer cases to juvenile intake in Walworth county. But nothing happened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11584 - 2017-09-19
. This was the standard procedure used to refer cases to juvenile intake in Walworth county. But nothing happened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11584 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
and his trial counsel testified. Trial counsel testified that he did not treat Kachelski’s case any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12449 - 2005-03-31
and his trial counsel testified. Trial counsel testified that he did not treat Kachelski’s case any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12449 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 23, 2010 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
criminal damage to property in Milwaukee County Circuit Court case number 2009CM1567 on March 24, 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56876 - 2010-11-22
criminal damage to property in Milwaukee County Circuit Court case number 2009CM1567 on March 24, 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56876 - 2010-11-22
State v. Todd S. Meske
. This was the standard procedure used to refer cases to juvenile intake in Walworth county
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11584 - 2005-03-31
. This was the standard procedure used to refer cases to juvenile intake in Walworth county
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11584 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for sentencing enhancement purposes in this OWI case. Witte argues that the circuit court erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168846 - 2017-09-21
for sentencing enhancement purposes in this OWI case. Witte argues that the circuit court erred in finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168846 - 2017-09-21