Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23891 - 23900 of 62338 for child support.
Search results 23891 - 23900 of 62338 for child support.
COURT OF APPEALS
be suppressed as a fruit of the illegal search. Because we conclude that the warrant was supported by probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135364 - 2015-02-24
be suppressed as a fruit of the illegal search. Because we conclude that the warrant was supported by probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135364 - 2015-02-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
failed to determine whether reasonable suspicion supported the stop of his vehicle. Second, he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=661120 - 2023-05-25
failed to determine whether reasonable suspicion supported the stop of his vehicle. Second, he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=661120 - 2023-05-25
CA Blank Order
. 738, 744 (1967). The no-merit report addresses: (1) whether the evidence was sufficient to support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101201 - 2013-08-19
. 738, 744 (1967). The no-merit report addresses: (1) whether the evidence was sufficient to support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101201 - 2013-08-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, supported a determination that Gaetz no longer met the criteria for commitment as a sexually violent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88073 - 2014-09-15
, supported a determination that Gaetz no longer met the criteria for commitment as a sexually violent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88073 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as a fruit of the illegal search. Because we conclude that the warrant was supported by probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135364 - 2017-09-21
as a fruit of the illegal search. Because we conclude that the warrant was supported by probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135364 - 2017-09-21
Mary McKnight v. Teachers Retirement Board of Wisconsin
evidence in the record to support the employer’s determination and therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2943 - 2005-03-31
evidence in the record to support the employer’s determination and therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2943 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mary Krueger
relief. Krueger argues that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support her conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17982 - 2005-05-02
relief. Krueger argues that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support her conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17982 - 2005-05-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
also contends that sufficient evidence did not support the jury’s verdict. We affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114086 - 2017-09-21
also contends that sufficient evidence did not support the jury’s verdict. We affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114086 - 2017-09-21
Jessie Davis v. Kelch Corporation
, thereby leaving its ultimate conclusion bereft of any logical support. Because there is credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6450 - 2005-03-31
, thereby leaving its ultimate conclusion bereft of any logical support. Because there is credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6450 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The motion was supported only by an affidavit from Central Bank’s litigation attorney, which did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98255 - 2014-09-15
. The motion was supported only by an affidavit from Central Bank’s litigation attorney, which did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98255 - 2014-09-15