Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23891 - 23900 of 29823 for des.
Search results 23891 - 23900 of 29823 for des.
Rite-Hite Corporation v. Board of Review of the Village of Brown Deer
by the trial court's thoughtful and comprehensive written decision, our review is de novo. See id., 164 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11657 - 2005-03-31
by the trial court's thoughtful and comprehensive written decision, our review is de novo. See id., 164 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11657 - 2005-03-31
WI App 55 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP507-CR Complete Titl...
de novo. Zellner v. Cedarburg Sch. Dist., 2007 WI 53, ¶16, 300 Wis. 2d 290, 731 N.W.2d 240. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80923 - 2013-04-25
de novo. Zellner v. Cedarburg Sch. Dist., 2007 WI 53, ¶16, 300 Wis. 2d 290, 731 N.W.2d 240. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80923 - 2013-04-25
Marshall E. Begel v. Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances. UFE, Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis. 2d 274, 284, 548
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2799 - 2005-03-31
deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances. UFE, Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis. 2d 274, 284, 548
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2799 - 2005-03-31
State v. Timothy Ziebart
entitling a defendant to a hearing is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 310
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2700 - 2005-03-31
entitling a defendant to a hearing is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. at 310
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2700 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court agreed that the attorney serving as Brenda’s GAL in the termination proceeding “ma[de] sense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72888 - 2011-10-26
. The court agreed that the attorney serving as Brenda’s GAL in the termination proceeding “ma[de] sense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72888 - 2011-10-26
2007 WI APP 116
to a jury trial is a question of constitutional fact that we review de novo. See State v. Cloud, 133 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28507 - 2007-04-26
to a jury trial is a question of constitutional fact that we review de novo. See State v. Cloud, 133 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28507 - 2007-04-26
State v. Crystal L. Bizzle
is a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo. See State v. Muniz, 181 Wis.2d 928, 931, 512
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12990 - 2005-03-31
is a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo. See State v. Muniz, 181 Wis.2d 928, 931, 512
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12990 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John Foster Fant
, whether the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13116 - 2017-09-21
, whether the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13116 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Booker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58135 - 2014-09-15
a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt is a question of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Booker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58135 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
satisfy the statutory standards, however, is a question of law that is reviewed de novo. Marathon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739052 - 2023-12-13
satisfy the statutory standards, however, is a question of law that is reviewed de novo. Marathon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739052 - 2023-12-13