Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2391 - 2400 of 13653 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Door Wlingi Blitar.
Search results 2391 - 2400 of 13653 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja Fortress Double Door Wlingi Blitar.
State v. Ryan Ross
when the police [while executing a search warrant for his premises] smashed in the door to his house
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4079 - 2005-03-31
when the police [while executing a search warrant for his premises] smashed in the door to his house
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4079 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
circumstances to arrest him when he opened the door of his apartment; the protective sweep following Cervantes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92734 - 2013-02-11
circumstances to arrest him when he opened the door of his apartment; the protective sweep following Cervantes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92734 - 2013-02-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Officer Shull went to the apartment door and listened initially. [Prosecutor]: What did you hear when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149111 - 2017-09-21
and Officer Shull went to the apartment door and listened initially. [Prosecutor]: What did you hear when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149111 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel gave him ineffective assistance when he opened the door to otherwise excluded shoe-print report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111198 - 2017-09-21
counsel gave him ineffective assistance when he opened the door to otherwise excluded shoe-print report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111198 - 2017-09-21
State v. Brian C. Wulff
to a new trial would violate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17029 - 2005-03-31
to a new trial would violate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17029 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that § 632.32(5)(i) does not permit this type of double reduction. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446954 - 2021-10-28
that § 632.32(5)(i) does not permit this type of double reduction. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446954 - 2021-10-28
Jeffrey Opichka v. Racine County
, on the other hand, received an improper double benefit according to the deputies: it not only recovered amounts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24711 - 2006-05-30
, on the other hand, received an improper double benefit according to the deputies: it not only recovered amounts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24711 - 2006-05-30
State v. Jerome L. Thoms
conviction was consecutive to the earlier sentence, it was inappropriate to give Thoms double credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15297 - 2005-03-31
conviction was consecutive to the earlier sentence, it was inappropriate to give Thoms double credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15297 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 14
that the evidence is double-hearsay—the officer’s statements of what the witness told him Williams said. ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44822 - 2014-09-15
that the evidence is double-hearsay—the officer’s statements of what the witness told him Williams said. ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44822 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
charged the same attempted act of sexual intercourse in violation of the double jeopardy clause. ¶20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81178 - 2014-09-15
charged the same attempted act of sexual intercourse in violation of the double jeopardy clause. ¶20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81178 - 2014-09-15