Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2391 - 2400 of 5225 for ey.

David Kneer v. James M. Sarkauskas
discovered their falsity. Id. He may not close his eyes to what is obvious. Id. "If the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9302 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
Drescher had glassy eyes and appeared to lean on the car door for support when exiting his vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20082 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
Nevertheless, Ardis insists that the circuit court “reviewed the record and the opposing affidavits with an eye
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50850 - 2010-06-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Richer’s “eyes were glassy and his speech was somewhat slurred.” Richer told Mathison “he had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75482 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
to Vergos, Vergos observed that Ahern had red and bloodshot eyes. Vergos told Ahern to get back into his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72624 - 2011-10-25

[PDF] State v. Shawn A. Timm
with Timm, Streubel observed that Timm’s “eyelids were heavy…. His eyes were very glassy and his speech
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4847 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Carl C. Gilbert, Jr
as “strong” and that the credibility of Gilbert and other inmates “would be questionable in the eyes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11539 - 2017-09-19

State v. Carl C. Gilbert
of Gilbert and other inmates “would be questionable in the eyes of a jury.” Gilbert’s attorney explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11538 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Marvin C. Seay
. Eye Care Ctr., Inc., 94 Wis. 2d 201, 203, 287 N.W.2d 810 (1980) (an appellant should be permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3432 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 18, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
to the court, the federal probation officer has been regarded as “the court’s ‘eyes and ears,’ a neutral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26834 - 2006-10-17