Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2391 - 2400 of 63536 for records.
Search results 2391 - 2400 of 63536 for records.
[PDF]
WI APP 92
did not order that the audio tapes recorded by the undercover officers and played for the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36384 - 2014-09-15
did not order that the audio tapes recorded by the undercover officers and played for the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36384 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
prior record; (3) “[t]he type and seriousness of the offense”; (4) “[t]he adequacy and suitability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=584811 - 2022-11-02
prior record; (3) “[t]he type and seriousness of the offense”; (4) “[t]he adequacy and suitability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=584811 - 2022-11-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the harassment injunction. Based upon a No. 2024AP1299 2 review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=957766 - 2025-05-20
the harassment injunction. Based upon a No. 2024AP1299 2 review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=957766 - 2025-05-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
this appeal based solely on Worzalla’s brief and the record. As that order noted, although summary reversal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501423 - 2022-03-31
this appeal based solely on Worzalla’s brief and the record. As that order noted, although summary reversal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501423 - 2022-03-31
CA Blank Order
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142448 - 2015-05-26
, was advised of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142448 - 2015-05-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159570 - 2017-09-21
to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159570 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert R. Shaffer
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11137 - 2005-03-31
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11137 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the harassment injunction. Based upon a No. 2024AP1299 2 review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=957766 - 2025-05-20
the harassment injunction. Based upon a No. 2024AP1299 2 review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=957766 - 2025-05-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude no issue of arguable merit appears, and the order is summarily affirmed. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194575 - 2017-09-21
of the record, we conclude no issue of arguable merit appears, and the order is summarily affirmed. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194575 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907070 - 2025-01-29
report. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907070 - 2025-01-29