Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2391 - 2400 of 21449 for warrants.
Search results 2391 - 2400 of 21449 for warrants.
State v. Deborah E.
“was not so egregious as to warrant termination.” ¶4 This court concludes: (1) Deborah
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4682 - 2005-03-31
“was not so egregious as to warrant termination.” ¶4 This court concludes: (1) Deborah
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4682 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert L. Kruse
into the calculation on an actuarial instrument—then a new hearing may be warranted. Often, however, a new expert
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20654 - 2005-12-14
into the calculation on an actuarial instrument—then a new hearing may be warranted. Often, however, a new expert
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20654 - 2005-12-14
COURT OF APPEALS
in that area could possibly warrant further investigation. ¶3 Officer Rydzewski testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66702 - 2011-06-27
in that area could possibly warrant further investigation. ¶3 Officer Rydzewski testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66702 - 2011-06-27
[PDF]
State v. Christopher L. Combs
may be warranted. Often, however, a new expert opinion is based in part on new information
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20655 - 2017-09-21
may be warranted. Often, however, a new expert opinion is based in part on new information
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20655 - 2017-09-21
State v. Deborah E.
“was not so egregious as to warrant termination.” ¶4 This court concludes: (1) Deborah
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4681 - 2005-03-31
“was not so egregious as to warrant termination.” ¶4 This court concludes: (1) Deborah
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4681 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the juror’s encounter with Hoffman were not sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a mistrial. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601012 - 2022-12-15
of the juror’s encounter with Hoffman were not sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a mistrial. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601012 - 2022-12-15
[PDF]
State v. Cordell A. Bufford
a search warrant to enter the room and requested that Mrs. Stefanski bring the bag containing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2856 - 2017-09-19
a search warrant to enter the room and requested that Mrs. Stefanski bring the bag containing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2856 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
for the mistrial request is sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial. See id. We will uphold the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28335 - 2014-09-15
for the mistrial request is sufficiently prejudicial to warrant a new trial. See id. We will uphold the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28335 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The substance tested positive for cocaine. Officers later obtained a search warrant for Jones’s cell phone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704322 - 2023-09-19
. The substance tested positive for cocaine. Officers later obtained a search warrant for Jones’s cell phone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704322 - 2023-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a parked vehicle in that area could possibly warrant further investigation. ¶3 Officer Rydzewski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66702 - 2014-09-15
a parked vehicle in that area could possibly warrant further investigation. ¶3 Officer Rydzewski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66702 - 2014-09-15