Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23901 - 23910 of 64995 for or b.
Search results 23901 - 23910 of 64995 for or b.
State v. Aaron C. Tuomi
concentration (OWPAC), second offense, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(b). Tuomi argues that an anonymous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5472 - 2005-03-31
concentration (OWPAC), second offense, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(b). Tuomi argues that an anonymous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5472 - 2005-03-31
State v. David R. Messner
. Stat. § 943.10(1)(a) and (2)(b) (1997-98)[2] (burglary of a building and becoming armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15553 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. § 943.10(1)(a) and (2)(b) (1997-98)[2] (burglary of a building and becoming armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15553 - 2005-03-31
Wilbert Erickson v. Green Lake County Board of Adjustment
Shoreland Protection Ordinance, No. 303-85 § 5.1 (1999)[1] and Wis. Admin. Code § NR 115.05(3)(b)1. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2439 - 2005-03-31
Shoreland Protection Ordinance, No. 303-85 § 5.1 (1999)[1] and Wis. Admin. Code § NR 115.05(3)(b)1. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2439 - 2005-03-31
State v. Derek A. Hinton
prongs of the test, the trial court properly denied his motion for a new trial. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11583 - 2005-03-31
prongs of the test, the trial court properly denied his motion for a new trial. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11583 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard F. Posius
to Wis. Stat. 346.63(1)(b). He argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3688 - 2005-03-31
to Wis. Stat. 346.63(1)(b). He argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3688 - 2005-03-31
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Stephenie Ann T.H.
as the following: (a) The likelihood of the child’s adoption after termination. (b) The age and health
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6156 - 2005-03-31
as the following: (a) The likelihood of the child’s adoption after termination. (b) The age and health
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6156 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the sentencing objectives.” Id., 270 Wis. 2d 535, ¶46. The court went on to explain that: “[b]y stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33994 - 2008-09-15
the sentencing objectives.” Id., 270 Wis. 2d 535, ¶46. The court went on to explain that: “[b]y stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33994 - 2008-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
cause hearing following initial detention. Indeed, both § 51.20(2)(b) and § 51.20(7) refer to the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121149 - 2014-09-09
cause hearing following initial detention. Indeed, both § 51.20(2)(b) and § 51.20(7) refer to the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121149 - 2014-09-09
Robert P. Stupar v. Township of Presque Isle
, Defendants-Respondents, JAMES TAIT, d/b/a CENTURY 21, JIM TAIT REAL ESTATE and ERNIE ROSSOW
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9213 - 2005-03-31
, Defendants-Respondents, JAMES TAIT, d/b/a CENTURY 21, JIM TAIT REAL ESTATE and ERNIE ROSSOW
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9213 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
remanded with directions. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143087 - 2015-06-16
remanded with directions. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143087 - 2015-06-16